0370 270 6000

Cercato-Gouveia v Kyprianou and Another, Court of Appeal, 30 November 2001

14 December 2001
The issues

Summary Judgment whether appropriate in respect of claim involving vicarious liability on the part of an employer

The facts

The Defendant succeeded in Application for Summary Judgment against Claimant. Claimant appealed.

The Claimant was a Waiter and was sacked following an incident at work. In the course of the incident, his Manager assaulted him injuring the Claimant’s finger. He sued his employer, seeking damages for wrongful dismissal and assault. The Defendant applied for Summary Judgment in respect of the assault claim.

The decision

1. The Judge had found that it was wholly unarguable that the Manager had any authority to assault the employee and that therefore there was no prospect of the Claimant succeeding in the assault claim as against his employer on the basis of the employer’s vicarious liability.

2. A decision had been made before Lister -v- Hesley Hall Limited.

3. The employer owed the usual duty of care to the employee, which duty reposed in the Manager.

4. His duties included responsibility for discipline of staff. The assault took place within working hours and at the hotel and in the course of disciplinary action. The assault had taken place shortly after the Claimant had been dismissed and therefore the assault was part and parcel of what the Manager was employed to do.

Cases involving vicarious liability of employers were “fact-sensitive”.

It could not be said that there was no real prospect of success. There was on the face of it a close connection between the assault committed by the Manager and the Claimant’s employment. This could only be dealt with after a Trial and a full examination of the evidence.

Appeal allowed.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Court of Appeal confirms exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies in Canadian pipeline dispute

On 10 June 2022 the Court of Appeal upheld an anti-suit injunction granted in favour of insurers by Mr Justice Jacobs in September 2021 restraining proceedings from being brought in Canada and enforcing the exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies.

View

Blogs

Payment Fraud landscape shaped by technology in 2021

Payment systems across Europe are under increased pressure to mitigate fraud risks and defend against persistent attacks from enablers using ever more sophisticated and malicious viruses and malware.

View

Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.

View

Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up