0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Sollitt v D.J. Broady Ltd

2 November 2001
The issues

Gale -v- Superdrug – admissions – attempts to resile from admissions.

The facts

The Claimant in 1994 was injured when he was hit by the bucket of an excavator owned by the First Defendant DJ Brody Limited. They denied liability. The Defence admitted the accident and employment, but neither denied nor admitted negligence, causation and loss and damage. Subsequently, by letter the Solicitors admitted liability. Subsequently, statements were prepared and exchanged. As a result of those investigations, an application was made for DJ Brody Limited to be replaced by TD Brody Investments Limited as Defendant. The Application was refused. The Defendant appealed.

The decision

1. In law liability lay with the Second Defendant TD Brody Investments.

2. The Solicitors made the admission of liability following instructions from Insurers and therefore were authorised to make that admission. If they did not have actual authority, they had ostensible authority.

3. The Defendants relied on Gale -v- Superdrug Stores Plc, arguing that an admission made by mistake could be withdrawn if there was no prejudice. That decision lay down valuable guidance as to how a discretion was to be exercised, but no principle of law was laid down. However, it was right that there was a need to look at the prejudice which each party suffered. Bearing in mind the respective prejudices as against Claimant and Defendant, and whilst the Judge below had not performed a balancing exercise, it was clear that had he done so, he would have come to the same conclusion.

Appeal dismissed

focus on...

Legal updates

Contingent loss in negligence claims

Contingent loss is relevant to limitation; specifically, the date at which a claimant’s cause of action accrues for the purposes of a claim in the tort of negligence (as many claims against professional advisers are framed).

View

Legal updates

Legal and regulatory monthly update - September 2019

The latest update covering delegated authority, insurance product development, the senior insurance managers regime, data protection, operational control frameworks, Lloyds market, and horizon scanning.

View

Legal updates

Kuoni referred to the CJEU by Supreme Court for clarification - possible impact on breach of contract, vicarious liability and assumption of responsibility claims for sexual abuse and assault

We were hoping to be able to give you some interesting insights following the judgment of X v Kuoni Travel Ltd but that will have to wait for another day.

View

Legal updates

The disappearance of LIBOR

Companies should undertake a comprehensive review and audit to identify those products and legacy contracts that are LIBOR-linked and carry out an in-depth risk assessment of discontinuation. Where possible, companies should look at appointing an individual to oversee the programme.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up