0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Smith v Stephens, Birmingham District Registry

8 November 2001
The issues

Joint Experts – Privilege – Impartiality – Whether one party should meet the Joint Expert.

The facts

Claimant wanted to have a consultation in the Defendants absence with joint instructed Experts. The liability settlement had already been approved by the Court. Quantum remained in dispute. There were seven Expert Witnesses all jointly instructed. A conference was sought by Counsel with himself, his solicitor and the Joint Experts and the Claimant present. The Defendant objected.

The decision

1. The single joint Experts had failed to comply with Paragraph 19.8 of the Code of Guidance for Expert Witnesses. They had not informed the Defendant of the consultation or sought his consent. For one side to have such a consultation with the other absent was contrary to the over-riding objective.

2. It was clearly inconsistent with a Court direction for Joint Experts for one side secretly to ascertain the strength of that evidence in a private consultation.

3. The appropriate way forward would have been by way of questions. Defendant’s application to prevent the meeting proceeding allowed.

focus on...

Legal updates

Contingent loss in negligence claims

Contingent loss is relevant to limitation; specifically, the date at which a claimant’s cause of action accrues for the purposes of a claim in the tort of negligence (as many claims against professional advisers are framed).

View

Legal updates

Legal and regulatory monthly update - September 2019

The latest update covering delegated authority, insurance product development, the senior insurance managers regime, data protection, operational control frameworks, Lloyds market, and horizon scanning.

View

Legal updates

Kuoni referred to the CJEU by Supreme Court for clarification - possible impact on breach of contract, vicarious liability and assumption of responsibility claims for sexual abuse and assault

We were hoping to be able to give you some interesting insights following the judgment of X v Kuoni Travel Ltd but that will have to wait for another day.

View

Legal updates

The disappearance of LIBOR

Companies should undertake a comprehensive review and audit to identify those products and legacy contracts that are LIBOR-linked and carry out an in-depth risk assessment of discontinuation. Where possible, companies should look at appointing an individual to oversee the programme.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up