0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Smith v Stephens, Birmingham District Registry

8 November 2001
The issues

Joint Experts – Privilege – Impartiality – Whether one party should meet the Joint Expert.

The facts

Claimant wanted to have a consultation in the Defendants absence with joint instructed Experts. The liability settlement had already been approved by the Court. Quantum remained in dispute. There were seven Expert Witnesses all jointly instructed. A conference was sought by Counsel with himself, his solicitor and the Joint Experts and the Claimant present. The Defendant objected.

The decision

1. The single joint Experts had failed to comply with Paragraph 19.8 of the Code of Guidance for Expert Witnesses. They had not informed the Defendant of the consultation or sought his consent. For one side to have such a consultation with the other absent was contrary to the over-riding objective.

2. It was clearly inconsistent with a Court direction for Joint Experts for one side secretly to ascertain the strength of that evidence in a private consultation.

3. The appropriate way forward would have been by way of questions. Defendant’s application to prevent the meeting proceeding allowed.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


Legal updates

Non-payment of insurance premiums during the Coronavirus pandemic

The forced closure of many businesses as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recent reports from the Office for National Statistics state that the economy was 25% smaller in April than it was in February this year.


Legal updates

Reinstatement for property damage losses – when does it apply?

The Court of Appeal has recently considered the correct test for measuring the indemnity for property damage losses and has provided useful guidance on whether an insured needs to intend to reinstate the property to its pre-loss condition.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up