0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Dorington v Lawrence, Bristol District Registry

26 November 2001
The issues

Brain damage – Quantum – Future care – Discount – Independent living fund – Roberts & Johnson.

The facts

The claimant was knocked from his motorbike by the defendant’s car on the 31 March 1991. He was 20. Liability was settled with judgment settled at 85% in the claimant’s favour. The claimant suffered brain damage. He continued to suffer from epileptic seizures. He had left sided visual loss, left sided limb weakness, left side sensory disorder and serious behaviour disorder. There had been a major deterioration in his physical and intellectual capacity. He had been cared for by mother and sister before trial when 24 hour paid care was to about to be put in place.

The decision

1. General damages of £135,000 would be awarded, which was just below the top end of the bracket since the claimant was still able to do and enjoy some limited things.

2. A discount of one fifth would be made for the commercial care rate in respect of voluntary care.

3. Payments made from Independent Living Fund to help with the cost of paid care was deductible from the award of damage.

4. No Roberts v Johnston award would be made, as claimant would probably have left home and obtained his own accommodation by the relevant date.

5. Although the claimant had only been employed for a short time before the accident as a sales man. It would be reasonable to assume that he would have continued to earn a net average wage of non-manual employees.

6. A multiple of 22.75 was appropriate.

7. There would be no discount for the possibility of continuing family care as 24hr professional care was needed – professional care is assessed at £57,000 per annum.

8. Damages for the future cost of speech, music and occupational therapy would be allowed.

focus on...

Legal updates

Contingent loss in negligence claims

Contingent loss is relevant to limitation; specifically, the date at which a claimant’s cause of action accrues for the purposes of a claim in the tort of negligence (as many claims against professional advisers are framed).

View

Legal updates

Legal and regulatory monthly update - September 2019

The latest update covering delegated authority, insurance product development, the senior insurance managers regime, data protection, operational control frameworks, Lloyds market, and horizon scanning.

View

Legal updates

Kuoni referred to the CJEU by Supreme Court for clarification - possible impact on breach of contract, vicarious liability and assumption of responsibility claims for sexual abuse and assault

We were hoping to be able to give you some interesting insights following the judgment of X v Kuoni Travel Ltd but that will have to wait for another day.

View

Legal updates

The disappearance of LIBOR

Companies should undertake a comprehensive review and audit to identify those products and legacy contracts that are LIBOR-linked and carry out an in-depth risk assessment of discontinuation. Where possible, companies should look at appointing an individual to oversee the programme.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up