Please sign in with your existing account details.
Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.
Privacy statement - Terms and conditions
Forgotten your password?
You have exceeded the maximum number of login attempts for this email address and your account has been locked. An email has been sent to member of Browne Jacobson's web team and some one will be contacting you over the next two working days with details of how to change your password.
Are you sure you want to remove this item from you pinned content?
Occupiers liability – Stack of chairs falling – Duty of care.
The Claimant was a student at Blackpool College and had an accident when her knee was dislocated following a fall of a stack of 4 chairs. The chairs had been stacked by students. The Trial Judge filed for the Claimant on the basis that the Defendants had issued no warnings as to how chairs should have been stacked and the dangers that followed from the chairs being stacked improperly. The Defendant appealed on the basis that there was a duty of care including a duty to instruct as to the correct way of stacking.
1. The duty under Section 2 of the Occupiers Liability Act 1957 was not absolute.
2. The Judges finding as to the apparent danger of stacking chairs improperly was one much benefiting from hindsight.
3. If it was wrong to put unreasonable obligations on occupiers – see Bolton v Stone 1951 particularly the speech of Lord Porter.
4. A reasonably careful member of staff would not think that the chairs would be inappropriately stacked or likely to fall over spontaneously or that if they did they would cause injury with any seriousness, or that any warning would make any difference.
5. The type of injury that the Claimant suffered would seem to be a highly unlikely result of a stack of four chairs falling.
Appeal allowed.
Guest writer, Finch Consulting Senior Consultant Teli Chinelis applies his expertise in preparing engineering reports in relation to noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) claims to explain information that is required from the claimant and information that is required and is advisable to be retained by employers, in order to ensure that claims can be fairly represented.
View
On Monday 25 November the 2011 SRA Handbook is replaced by the 2019 SRA Standards and Regulations (often referred to as STARS).This is the 26th version of the Code of Conduct for Solicitors.
Contingent loss is relevant to limitation; specifically, the date at which a claimant’s cause of action accrues for the purposes of a claim in the tort of negligence (as many claims against professional advisers are framed).
The latest update covering delegated authority, insurance product development, the senior insurance managers regime, data protection, operational control frameworks, Lloyds market, and horizon scanning.
The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.
Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.
Sign up