0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Burke v Lancashire County Council and another, Court of Appeal, 7 November 2001

15 November 2001
The issues

Occupiers liability – Stack of chairs falling – Duty of care.

The facts

The Claimant was a student at Blackpool College and had an accident when her knee was dislocated following a fall of a stack of 4 chairs. The chairs had been stacked by students. The Trial Judge filed for the Claimant on the basis that the Defendants had issued no warnings as to how chairs should have been stacked and the dangers that followed from the chairs being stacked improperly. The Defendant appealed on the basis that there was a duty of care including a duty to instruct as to the correct way of stacking.

The decision

1. The duty under Section 2 of the Occupiers Liability Act 1957 was not absolute.

2. The Judges finding as to the apparent danger of stacking chairs improperly was one much benefiting from hindsight.

3. If it was wrong to put unreasonable obligations on occupiers – see Bolton v Stone 1951 particularly the speech of Lord Porter.

4. A reasonably careful member of staff would not think that the chairs would be inappropriately stacked or likely to fall over spontaneously or that if they did they would cause injury with any seriousness, or that any warning would make any difference.

5. The type of injury that the Claimant suffered would seem to be a highly unlikely result of a stack of four chairs falling.

Appeal allowed.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.

View

Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.

View

Legal updates

Non-payment of insurance premiums during the Coronavirus pandemic

The forced closure of many businesses as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recent reports from the Office for National Statistics state that the economy was 25% smaller in April than it was in February this year.

View

Legal updates

Reinstatement for property damage losses – when does it apply?

The Court of Appeal has recently considered the correct test for measuring the indemnity for property damage losses and has provided useful guidance on whether an insured needs to intend to reinstate the property to its pre-loss condition.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up