0370 270 6000

Burke v Lancashire County Council and another, Court of Appeal, 7 November 2001

15 November 2001
The issues

Occupiers liability – Stack of chairs falling – Duty of care.

The facts

The Claimant was a student at Blackpool College and had an accident when her knee was dislocated following a fall of a stack of 4 chairs. The chairs had been stacked by students. The Trial Judge filed for the Claimant on the basis that the Defendants had issued no warnings as to how chairs should have been stacked and the dangers that followed from the chairs being stacked improperly. The Defendant appealed on the basis that there was a duty of care including a duty to instruct as to the correct way of stacking.

The decision

1. The duty under Section 2 of the Occupiers Liability Act 1957 was not absolute.

2. The Judges finding as to the apparent danger of stacking chairs improperly was one much benefiting from hindsight.

3. If it was wrong to put unreasonable obligations on occupiers – see Bolton v Stone 1951 particularly the speech of Lord Porter.

4. A reasonably careful member of staff would not think that the chairs would be inappropriately stacked or likely to fall over spontaneously or that if they did they would cause injury with any seriousness, or that any warning would make any difference.

5. The type of injury that the Claimant suffered would seem to be a highly unlikely result of a stack of four chairs falling.

Appeal allowed.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Court of Appeal confirms exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies in Canadian pipeline dispute

On 10 June 2022 the Court of Appeal upheld an anti-suit injunction granted in favour of insurers by Mr Justice Jacobs in September 2021 restraining proceedings from being brought in Canada and enforcing the exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies.



Payment Fraud landscape shaped by technology in 2021

Payment systems across Europe are under increased pressure to mitigate fraud risks and defend against persistent attacks from enablers using ever more sophisticated and malicious viruses and malware.


Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up