0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Whittaker v Soper, Court of Appeal

16 October 2001
The issues

Police Officers – Training Exercises – Were the Police Authority Negligent.

The facts

The Claimant brought an action for personal injuries against the Met. The Claimant was a Detective Constable who attended a Refresher Course in Arrest and Restraint Procedures. The Course took place in a room with a concrete floor. The Policemen paired off for the purposes of an exercise. Each pair was given a judo mat. In the course of the exercise, in which the Claimant was playing the role of non-policeman suspect, he was injured when he fell and landed on his left knee. He argued that two mats rather than one should have been provided which would have stopped him from falling onto the concrete floor. The Trial Judge disagreed.

The Claimant Appealed.

The decision

1. The Judge stated that he had to draw a balance between safety and realism.

2. That was not the basis however, on which he had actually decided the case.

3. The risk to Officers falling on the concrete was foreseeable. This was why one mat had been provided. It would not have been impossible or impractical to provide two mats, which would have been a reasonable response to the risk, which had already been seen.

Accordingly the appeal would be allowed.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


Legal updates

Non-payment of insurance premiums during the Coronavirus pandemic

The forced closure of many businesses as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recent reports from the Office for National Statistics state that the economy was 25% smaller in April than it was in February this year.


Legal updates

Reinstatement for property damage losses – when does it apply?

The Court of Appeal has recently considered the correct test for measuring the indemnity for property damage losses and has provided useful guidance on whether an insured needs to intend to reinstate the property to its pre-loss condition.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up