0370 270 6000

Whittaker v Soper, Court of Appeal

16 October 2001
The issues

Police Officers – Training Exercises – Were the Police Authority Negligent.

The facts

The Claimant brought an action for personal injuries against the Met. The Claimant was a Detective Constable who attended a Refresher Course in Arrest and Restraint Procedures. The Course took place in a room with a concrete floor. The Policemen paired off for the purposes of an exercise. Each pair was given a judo mat. In the course of the exercise, in which the Claimant was playing the role of non-policeman suspect, he was injured when he fell and landed on his left knee. He argued that two mats rather than one should have been provided which would have stopped him from falling onto the concrete floor. The Trial Judge disagreed.

The Claimant Appealed.

The decision

1. The Judge stated that he had to draw a balance between safety and realism.

2. That was not the basis however, on which he had actually decided the case.

3. The risk to Officers falling on the concrete was foreseeable. This was why one mat had been provided. It would not have been impossible or impractical to provide two mats, which would have been a reasonable response to the risk, which had already been seen.

Accordingly the appeal would be allowed.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Court of Appeal confirms exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies in Canadian pipeline dispute

On 10 June 2022 the Court of Appeal upheld an anti-suit injunction granted in favour of insurers by Mr Justice Jacobs in September 2021 restraining proceedings from being brought in Canada and enforcing the exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies.



Payment Fraud landscape shaped by technology in 2021

Payment systems across Europe are under increased pressure to mitigate fraud risks and defend against persistent attacks from enablers using ever more sophisticated and malicious viruses and malware.


Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up