0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Medicaments and related classes of Goods No.4, Court of Appeal

13 August 2001
The issues

Wasted costs – Lord Chancellor’s liability

The facts

This concerned an application by the Director General of Trading in the Restrictive Practises at Court. The hearing had to be abandoned because it appeared to the parties that a member of the Court was biased. The costs concerned were estimated as being in something of the region of a million pounds!

The applicants for the wasted costs submitted that their right to a fair trial under Article 6 of the European Convention of Human Rights had been infringed and that they were entitled to compensation by the Lord Chancellor who was an emanation of the State responsible for providing impartial tribunals to conduct trials.

The decision

The Lord Chancellor had argued that an impartial tribunal had been made available, subsequently, so that Article 6 had not been infringed. The Court had itself remedied the situation and the application had proceeded afresh in a reconstituted Court. It was trite convention law that an Appeal Court could remedy the defects of first instant decisions so that no violation could be said to have occurred. There was no authority for holding under convention law that in these circumstances applicants were entitled to recover wasted legal costs.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


Legal updates

Non-payment of insurance premiums during the Coronavirus pandemic

The forced closure of many businesses as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recent reports from the Office for National Statistics state that the economy was 25% smaller in April than it was in February this year.


Legal updates

Reinstatement for property damage losses – when does it apply?

The Court of Appeal has recently considered the correct test for measuring the indemnity for property damage losses and has provided useful guidance on whether an insured needs to intend to reinstate the property to its pre-loss condition.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up