0370 270 6000

Isaac v Chief Constable for the West Midlands Police, Court of Appeal

31 July 2001
The issues

Police – False Imprisonment – Exemplary damages – Aggravated Damages

The facts

Claimants succeeded in the Birmingham County Court in his action against the Police Authority for false imprisonment and prosecution. He had suffered injuries sustained in the course of resisting arrest. He was awarded interalia £5000 for exemplary damages, £2500 for malicious prosecution. There was no award for aggravated damages. The defendant appealed on the liability issue and the claimant cross appealed on the award of quantum arguing that the jury having awarded exemplary damages was bound to award aggravated damages.

The decision

1. The jury’s verdict was not inconsistent. The finding could not be disclosed.

2. In respect of the cross appeal the claimant relied on Thompson -v- Commissioner of Police for Metropolis. But there was nothing in that case to suggest that aggravated damages should also automatically follow exemplary damages.

Appeal and cross-appeal dismissed.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Court of Appeal confirms exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies in Canadian pipeline dispute

On 10 June 2022 the Court of Appeal upheld an anti-suit injunction granted in favour of insurers by Mr Justice Jacobs in September 2021 restraining proceedings from being brought in Canada and enforcing the exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies.



Payment Fraud landscape shaped by technology in 2021

Payment systems across Europe are under increased pressure to mitigate fraud risks and defend against persistent attacks from enablers using ever more sophisticated and malicious viruses and malware.


Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up