0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Callery v Gray & Russell v Pal Pack Corrugated Limited

23 July 2001
The issues

Costs – Insurance Premiums – Uplift Appropriate in respect of the CFA

The facts

These two appeals both concerned claim for personal injuries suffered in road traffic accidents. Both were settled quickly without any need to bring Court proceedings. In Callery the Circuit Judge upheld the District Judge’s decision allowing a success fee of 40%. In the other, a Circuit Judge reduced the claim success fee from 30% to 20%.

The decision

1. ATE premiums are in principal recoverable as part of the Claimant’s costs even if the claim is resolved without the need for proceedings. In principal a Claimant does nothing wrong if he enters into a CFA with a success fee and takes ATE insurance when he first consults his solicitor and before the letter of claim and therefore the Defendant’s response.

2. The Court gave some general guidance in respect of modest straightforward claims for compensation. In such cases where a CFA is agreed at the very beginning, 20% should be the maximum uplift that could reasonably be agreed.

3. It might be appropriate for solicitor and client to agree a two stage success fee. It gave as an example a situation where an uplift might be agreed at 100% subject to a maximum of 5% if the claim settles before the pre action protocol period. The 20% figure was a figure put forward tentatively on the basis of very limited data and the Court indicated that it might be appropriate to review that figure once better data was available.

4. A Costs Judge was directed to enquire as to the reasonableness of premiums and would deliver a separate judgment.

focus on...

Legal updates

Contingent loss in negligence claims

Contingent loss is relevant to limitation; specifically, the date at which a claimant’s cause of action accrues for the purposes of a claim in the tort of negligence (as many claims against professional advisers are framed).

View

Legal updates

Legal and regulatory monthly update - September 2019

The latest update covering delegated authority, insurance product development, the senior insurance managers regime, data protection, operational control frameworks, Lloyds market, and horizon scanning.

View

Legal updates

Kuoni referred to the CJEU by Supreme Court for clarification - possible impact on breach of contract, vicarious liability and assumption of responsibility claims for sexual abuse and assault

We were hoping to be able to give you some interesting insights following the judgment of X v Kuoni Travel Ltd but that will have to wait for another day.

View

Legal updates

The disappearance of LIBOR

Companies should undertake a comprehensive review and audit to identify those products and legacy contracts that are LIBOR-linked and carry out an in-depth risk assessment of discontinuation. Where possible, companies should look at appointing an individual to oversee the programme.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up