0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Hatton v Cooper, Court of Appeal

8 May 2001
The issues

Centre Of Road Collisions – Inferences To Be Drawn – Equal Responsibility

The facts

On 19th September 1995 during the day and in god visibility the Claimant’s car collided with the Defendant’s car when both were travelling in opposite directions. Neither party had any recollection of the impact and there were no eyewitnesses. The Judge found the Defendant wholly responsible for the collision. The Defendant accepted primary liability but alleged 50% contributory negligence. The Defendant alleged that both parties approached each other on a collision course near the centre of the road without deviating from it and responsibility should be shared equally.

The decision

On the evidence it was likely that one of the vehicles had suddenly changed direction when it was too late for the other to take evasive action. The Judge had concluded that the Defendant was wholly responsible on the basis of the evidence of the Claimant’s employer that he was a careful driver. The Judge had been wrong to attach any significant weight to that evidence. Without that evidence there was no basis for finding the Defendants solely responsible for the collision. The only reasonable and proper inference that could be drawn from the available evidence was that each party was partly responsible. Since the evidence did not enable the Court to apportion the blame equally between them it followed on the authority of Baker v Market Harbour Industrial Co-operative Society Limited (1953) that both drivers were equally responsible.

focus on...

Legal updates

Contingent loss in negligence claims

Contingent loss is relevant to limitation; specifically, the date at which a claimant’s cause of action accrues for the purposes of a claim in the tort of negligence (as many claims against professional advisers are framed).


Legal updates

Legal and regulatory monthly update - September 2019

The latest update covering delegated authority, insurance product development, the senior insurance managers regime, data protection, operational control frameworks, Lloyds market, and horizon scanning.


Legal updates

Kuoni referred to the CJEU by Supreme Court for clarification - possible impact on breach of contract, vicarious liability and assumption of responsibility claims for sexual abuse and assault

We were hoping to be able to give you some interesting insights following the judgment of X v Kuoni Travel Ltd but that will have to wait for another day.


Legal updates

The disappearance of LIBOR

Companies should undertake a comprehensive review and audit to identify those products and legacy contracts that are LIBOR-linked and carry out an in-depth risk assessment of discontinuation. Where possible, companies should look at appointing an individual to oversee the programme.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up