0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Barry v Winn, Court of Appeal

21 May 2001
The issues

Road Traffic – Infant Claimant Run Over – Liability

The facts

The Claimant was 11 years of age. He got off a double decker bus at a bus stop. He ran in front of the bus and across the road and was hit by the Defendant’s lorry. The Defendant was overtaking the bus, which was not moving and was on a dual carriageway. He was driving within the speed limit. It was found as a fact that the Claimant had stood on the pavement for a few seconds after getting off the bus and before he crossed the road.

The Judge at first instance found that if the Defendant had kept a proper lookout and anticipated the Claimant running into the road and had sounded his horn, then the accident would not have happened because the Claimant would not have run out.

The Defendant’s appealed to the Court of Appeal.

The decision

It was not open to the Judge to find that there was a risk that the Claimant would run out in front of the bus. There was no reasonably apparent possibility making it necessary for the Defendant to sound his horn. It was unlikely that the Defendant would have seen the Claimant when he got off the bus. The Judge had put too high a burden on the Defendant who could not be criticised.

Appeal allowed.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


Legal updates

Non-payment of insurance premiums during the Coronavirus pandemic

The forced closure of many businesses as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recent reports from the Office for National Statistics state that the economy was 25% smaller in April than it was in February this year.


Legal updates

Reinstatement for property damage losses – when does it apply?

The Court of Appeal has recently considered the correct test for measuring the indemnity for property damage losses and has provided useful guidance on whether an insured needs to intend to reinstate the property to its pre-loss condition.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up