0370 270 6000

Raymond Kemp v Santa Fe Company (North Sea) Ltd

2 April 2001
The issues

Stress at Work

The facts

The Claimant was employed by the Defendant as a buyer who was responsible for stocking oil rigs. He worked approximately 65 hours per week over 7 days and brought an action alleging the Defendant negligent for:-

(i) Subjecting the Claimant to long working hours;

(ii) Failing to replace staff who had died!;

(iii) Asking the Claimant to carry out investigations (fraud against another employee) which was stressful and put him in fear of his safety;

(iv) The Defendant’s employee was negligent in issuing threats of violence towards the Claimant.

The decision

The Claimant was successful.


The interesting fact is, according to the report on Lawtel, the Claimant had not had time off work before he suffered the breakdown and had not complained of illness or stress to the Defendant beforehand. The other point to note is that the case was issued 3 years and 2Ω months after the breakdown and the Judge apparently took into account the fact the case was issued outside the limitation when awarding damages which totalled £125,000. The clear implication being the Claimant was penalised when assessing damages for issuing outside the limitation period.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Court of Appeal confirms exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies in Canadian pipeline dispute

On 10 June 2022 the Court of Appeal upheld an anti-suit injunction granted in favour of insurers by Mr Justice Jacobs in September 2021 restraining proceedings from being brought in Canada and enforcing the exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies.



Payment Fraud landscape shaped by technology in 2021

Payment systems across Europe are under increased pressure to mitigate fraud risks and defend against persistent attacks from enablers using ever more sophisticated and malicious viruses and malware.


Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up