0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Raymond Kemp v Santa Fe Company (North Sea) Ltd

2 April 2001
The issues

Stress at Work

The facts

The Claimant was employed by the Defendant as a buyer who was responsible for stocking oil rigs. He worked approximately 65 hours per week over 7 days and brought an action alleging the Defendant negligent for:-

(i) Subjecting the Claimant to long working hours;

(ii) Failing to replace staff who had died!;

(iii) Asking the Claimant to carry out investigations (fraud against another employee) which was stressful and put him in fear of his safety;

(iv) The Defendant’s employee was negligent in issuing threats of violence towards the Claimant.

The decision

The Claimant was successful.


The interesting fact is, according to the report on Lawtel, the Claimant had not had time off work before he suffered the breakdown and had not complained of illness or stress to the Defendant beforehand. The other point to note is that the case was issued 3 years and 2Ω months after the breakdown and the Judge apparently took into account the fact the case was issued outside the limitation when awarding damages which totalled £125,000. The clear implication being the Claimant was penalised when assessing damages for issuing outside the limitation period.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


Legal updates

Non-payment of insurance premiums during the Coronavirus pandemic

The forced closure of many businesses as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recent reports from the Office for National Statistics state that the economy was 25% smaller in April than it was in February this year.


Legal updates

Reinstatement for property damage losses – when does it apply?

The Court of Appeal has recently considered the correct test for measuring the indemnity for property damage losses and has provided useful guidance on whether an insured needs to intend to reinstate the property to its pre-loss condition.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up