0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Newman v Whitbread Plc, Court of Appeal

5 March 2001
The issues

Whether It Was Proper For The Court To Enter Judgment On Behalf Of A Claimant On The Basis Of Issues Not Advanced By Either Party (!)

The facts

The Claimant worked for the Defendant as a Chef and fell down a set of stairs. He suffered from a pre-existing condition sustained in a road traffic accident. The accident in respect of which the Claimant sued occurred on 1996. The allegations of negligence and breach based on the variations and dimensions of the risings and goings of the steps on which the Claimant fell. No additional case was advanced during the trial. At no time during the trial did the Judge raise any issue as to the steps being satisfactory for most people but not for the Claimant with her disability. The Judge found in favour of the Claimant on the grounds that the steps were unsafe as a result of that disability although they were perfectly satisfactory for most people.
The Defendant appealed on the issue of liability.

The decision

The Claimant had been unable to remember how the accident had occurred. The case was neither opened nor closed in the way that the Judge found and the way that his decision was reached came as a surprise to Counsel for both parties. This was clearly unfair on the Defendant and the judgment must be overturned. It was inappropriate to order a re-trial because of the passage of time – the Judge’s “new case” could only be established without medical evidence on both side and it was unlikely that such evidence could be gathered 5 years after the accident.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


Legal updates

Non-payment of insurance premiums during the Coronavirus pandemic

The forced closure of many businesses as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recent reports from the Office for National Statistics state that the economy was 25% smaller in April than it was in February this year.


Legal updates

Reinstatement for property damage losses – when does it apply?

The Court of Appeal has recently considered the correct test for measuring the indemnity for property damage losses and has provided useful guidance on whether an insured needs to intend to reinstate the property to its pre-loss condition.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up