0370 270 6000

Newman v Whitbread Plc, Court of Appeal

5 March 2001
The issues

Whether It Was Proper For The Court To Enter Judgment On Behalf Of A Claimant On The Basis Of Issues Not Advanced By Either Party (!)

The facts

The Claimant worked for the Defendant as a Chef and fell down a set of stairs. He suffered from a pre-existing condition sustained in a road traffic accident. The accident in respect of which the Claimant sued occurred on 1996. The allegations of negligence and breach based on the variations and dimensions of the risings and goings of the steps on which the Claimant fell. No additional case was advanced during the trial. At no time during the trial did the Judge raise any issue as to the steps being satisfactory for most people but not for the Claimant with her disability. The Judge found in favour of the Claimant on the grounds that the steps were unsafe as a result of that disability although they were perfectly satisfactory for most people.
The Defendant appealed on the issue of liability.

The decision

The Claimant had been unable to remember how the accident had occurred. The case was neither opened nor closed in the way that the Judge found and the way that his decision was reached came as a surprise to Counsel for both parties. This was clearly unfair on the Defendant and the judgment must be overturned. It was inappropriate to order a re-trial because of the passage of time – the Judge’s “new case” could only be established without medical evidence on both side and it was unlikely that such evidence could be gathered 5 years after the accident.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Court of Appeal confirms exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies in Canadian pipeline dispute

On 10 June 2022 the Court of Appeal upheld an anti-suit injunction granted in favour of insurers by Mr Justice Jacobs in September 2021 restraining proceedings from being brought in Canada and enforcing the exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies.



Payment Fraud landscape shaped by technology in 2021

Payment systems across Europe are under increased pressure to mitigate fraud risks and defend against persistent attacks from enablers using ever more sophisticated and malicious viruses and malware.


Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up