0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Bermuda International Security Limited v KGMG, Court of Appeal

5 March 2001
The issues

Pre Accident Disclosure – Costs

The facts

BISL sought pre action disclosure from KPMG for the purposes of proposed proceedings against KPMG for negligence. At first instance Timothy Walker J granted an Order on the basis that there would be a saving for costs and that KPMG had already reviewed the documents (as a result of the proposed claim) and that it would therefore be no burden to hand them over and that the production might assist in the disposal of the case without recourse to litigation. He made no order that BISL should pay the costs not withstanding the presumption to the contrary under CPR 48.1. KBMG appealed. Before the appeal BISL conceded that it should pay KBMG costs of producing the documents but not of the application necessary to obtain the order.

The decision

It was early days in the life of rules relating to pre action disclosure and it was therefore (?) inappropriate for the Court of Appeal to lay down guidelines as to the way in which the discretion should be exercised. The exercise of the Judge’s discretion could not be criticised given that KBMJ in view of the Court of Appeal had unreasonably resisted the application.

Appeal dismissed.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


Legal updates

Non-payment of insurance premiums during the Coronavirus pandemic

The forced closure of many businesses as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recent reports from the Office for National Statistics state that the economy was 25% smaller in April than it was in February this year.


Legal updates

Reinstatement for property damage losses – when does it apply?

The Court of Appeal has recently considered the correct test for measuring the indemnity for property damage losses and has provided useful guidance on whether an insured needs to intend to reinstate the property to its pre-loss condition.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up