0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Nixon v FJ Morris Contracting Ltd, Queen's Bench Division, 21 December 2000

8 February 2001
The issues

Multiple Sclerosis – Causation

The facts

The Defendants employees in May 1992 allowed a lamp standard to fall onto the Claimant’s car as he was driving along a dual carriageway in Milton Keynes. In 1994 he was referred to a Neurologist who diagnosed MS. The case came before the Court to determine the nature and extent of the injuries sustained and whether it was possible for those types of injuries to trigger symptoms of MS.

The decision

In Dingly v Chief Constable of Strathclyde Police the First Division of the Inner House of the Court of Session found that academic studies failed to throw up any positive connection between MS and trauma.

Garland LJ had been provided with further and more up to date information and felt uninhibited from reaching different conclusions from those reached in Dingly. Three questions arose: –

a) Was it the case that trauma could provoke MS at all? In the course of the trial it was apparent that both experts accepted that the answer was yes, qualified by the words ” in a rare or exceptional case”.

b) If so, what type of trauma. Both experts were agreed that the answer to b was that it must be to the brain or spinal cord and typically the most vulnerable cervical spinal cord.

c) How severe must that trauma be? The answer from the expert evidence was that it had to be sufficiently severe to cause an alteration to the blood brain barrier (thus begging the question).

In this case Garland J found that it was not possible for injuries of the type sustained by the Claimant to trigger MS as there was no injury to the cervical spinal cord.

focus on...

Legal updates

Contingent loss in negligence claims

Contingent loss is relevant to limitation; specifically, the date at which a claimant’s cause of action accrues for the purposes of a claim in the tort of negligence (as many claims against professional advisers are framed).

View

Legal updates

Legal and regulatory monthly update - September 2019

The latest update covering delegated authority, insurance product development, the senior insurance managers regime, data protection, operational control frameworks, Lloyds market, and horizon scanning.

View

Legal updates

Kuoni referred to the CJEU by Supreme Court for clarification - possible impact on breach of contract, vicarious liability and assumption of responsibility claims for sexual abuse and assault

We were hoping to be able to give you some interesting insights following the judgment of X v Kuoni Travel Ltd but that will have to wait for another day.

View

Legal updates

The disappearance of LIBOR

Companies should undertake a comprehensive review and audit to identify those products and legacy contracts that are LIBOR-linked and carry out an in-depth risk assessment of discontinuation. Where possible, companies should look at appointing an individual to oversee the programme.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up