0370 270 6000

Coxon v Flintshire County Council (formerly Clwyd County Council), Court of Appeal

19 February 2001
The issues

Child Abuse – Quantum of Damages – Applicability or Otherwise of the Judicial Studies Board Guidelines

The facts

The Claimant was a victim of her parent’s physical and emotional abuse and was bullied at school. At the age of 14 she was taken into the care of the Local Authority. She was bullied by her fellow inmates without intervention by staff and subsequently was subjected to physical, emotional and sexual abuse at the hands of members of staff. On leaving the home she was placed with Foster Parents. She had a series of temporary jobs and developed a serious drink problem. She was left damaged and vulnerable. She became involved in drugs and married a heavy drug taker. She suffered from panic attacks, self-destructive behaviour. She met an older man who bullied her and blackmailed her to stay with him.

In the course of the North Wales Children’s Home litigation she was awarded £35,000.00 for pain, suffering, loss of amenity, £20,000.00 for loss of past earnings, £5,000.00 for future loss and £10,000.00 for the cost of future psychotherapy. The Local Authority appealed against the finding in respect of general damages arguing that this was not a case that fell into the category of severe psychiatric damage as defined in the JSB. It argued that the maximum that should have been awarded for pain and suffering and loss of amenity was £10,000.00.

The decision

The Court of Appeal was far from satisfied that the JSB applied in cases of this kind. Physical emotional and sexual abuse fell into a category wholly different from psychiatric damage that followed up personal injuries. There was therefore no definable bracket into which to place the case. The Judge was correct to take a broad-brush approach and could not be criticised for his findings of quantum.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Court of Appeal confirms exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies in Canadian pipeline dispute

On 10 June 2022 the Court of Appeal upheld an anti-suit injunction granted in favour of insurers by Mr Justice Jacobs in September 2021 restraining proceedings from being brought in Canada and enforcing the exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies.



Payment Fraud landscape shaped by technology in 2021

Payment systems across Europe are under increased pressure to mitigate fraud risks and defend against persistent attacks from enablers using ever more sophisticated and malicious viruses and malware.


Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up