0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Coxon v Flintshire County Council (formerly Clwyd County Council), Court of Appeal

19 February 2001
The issues

Child Abuse – Quantum of Damages – Applicability or Otherwise of the Judicial Studies Board Guidelines

The facts

The Claimant was a victim of her parent’s physical and emotional abuse and was bullied at school. At the age of 14 she was taken into the care of the Local Authority. She was bullied by her fellow inmates without intervention by staff and subsequently was subjected to physical, emotional and sexual abuse at the hands of members of staff. On leaving the home she was placed with Foster Parents. She had a series of temporary jobs and developed a serious drink problem. She was left damaged and vulnerable. She became involved in drugs and married a heavy drug taker. She suffered from panic attacks, self-destructive behaviour. She met an older man who bullied her and blackmailed her to stay with him.

In the course of the North Wales Children’s Home litigation she was awarded £35,000.00 for pain, suffering, loss of amenity, £20,000.00 for loss of past earnings, £5,000.00 for future loss and £10,000.00 for the cost of future psychotherapy. The Local Authority appealed against the finding in respect of general damages arguing that this was not a case that fell into the category of severe psychiatric damage as defined in the JSB. It argued that the maximum that should have been awarded for pain and suffering and loss of amenity was £10,000.00.

The decision

The Court of Appeal was far from satisfied that the JSB applied in cases of this kind. Physical emotional and sexual abuse fell into a category wholly different from psychiatric damage that followed up personal injuries. There was therefore no definable bracket into which to place the case. The Judge was correct to take a broad-brush approach and could not be criticised for his findings of quantum.

focus on...

Legal updates

Contingent loss in negligence claims

Contingent loss is relevant to limitation; specifically, the date at which a claimant’s cause of action accrues for the purposes of a claim in the tort of negligence (as many claims against professional advisers are framed).

View

Legal updates

Legal and regulatory monthly update - September 2019

The latest update covering delegated authority, insurance product development, the senior insurance managers regime, data protection, operational control frameworks, Lloyds market, and horizon scanning.

View

Legal updates

Kuoni referred to the CJEU by Supreme Court for clarification - possible impact on breach of contract, vicarious liability and assumption of responsibility claims for sexual abuse and assault

We were hoping to be able to give you some interesting insights following the judgment of X v Kuoni Travel Ltd but that will have to wait for another day.

View

Legal updates

The disappearance of LIBOR

Companies should undertake a comprehensive review and audit to identify those products and legacy contracts that are LIBOR-linked and carry out an in-depth risk assessment of discontinuation. Where possible, companies should look at appointing an individual to oversee the programme.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up