0370 270 6000

Arnott v Sprake & Another, Court of Appeal

26 February 2001
The issues

Duty Of Care to be Expected on Unclassified Roads from a Motorist.

The facts

The Claimant was driving a motorcycle on an unclassified rural road with a speed limit of 60 mph. He went around a left hand bend and collided with an agricultural vehicle driven by the First Defendants who was turning right into the lane from a junction on the Claimant’s left hand side.

There were no markings on the lane to indicate the approach to the junction. At first instance the Judge found the Defendants liable on the basis that the Claimant was travelling at 45mph and was unaware of the approaching junction. The bend in the lane was “unusually dangerous” and the width and length of the Defendant’s vehicle made it “an unusual vehicle”. There was a duty on the driver of the agricultural vehicle to place a warning triangle in the lane and/or switch on flashing lights and sound his horn as he turned.

The decision

There is no justification for the finding that point in the lane was unusually dangerous or that the farm vehicle was unusual. It was precisely the sort of junction that could be anticipated on a road of this type. The vehicle was a typical agricultural vehicle to be expected on country roads. The onus was on the driver on such a road to drive in a manner that would not put him at risk of being surprised by what was around the next bend.

Appeal allowed.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Court of Appeal confirms exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies in Canadian pipeline dispute

On 10 June 2022 the Court of Appeal upheld an anti-suit injunction granted in favour of insurers by Mr Justice Jacobs in September 2021 restraining proceedings from being brought in Canada and enforcing the exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies.



Payment Fraud landscape shaped by technology in 2021

Payment systems across Europe are under increased pressure to mitigate fraud risks and defend against persistent attacks from enablers using ever more sophisticated and malicious viruses and malware.


Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up