0370 270 6000

Munn v North West Water Ltd

2 November 2000
The issues

Summary Judgment – precise pleadings.

The facts

The Claimant bought a property to run as a fish and chip shop. The cellar flooded on several occasions. The flood water contained raw sewage. The Claimant issued proceedings alleging that the flooding was as a result of the main sewage system failing. She sought damages for the failure of the fish and chip shop business. In her Particulars she did not identify the precise nature of the allegations of the nuisance that she wished to rely upon. The Defendant applied for Summary Judgment submitting that the claim had not real prospect of success. The Recorder granted Summary Judgment finding that the Defendant was maintaining the system to a level required of it given it’s considerable age. The Claimant appealed.

The decision

The appeal would be allowed. Part 24 was not design to deprive the Claimant where the issues of fact if found in their favour would potentially produce a successful outcome. The inadequacy of the Claimant’s pleading had to be viewed in the light of the available evidence which was suggestive of a reasonable prospect of success.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Court of Appeal confirms exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies in Canadian pipeline dispute

On 10 June 2022 the Court of Appeal upheld an anti-suit injunction granted in favour of insurers by Mr Justice Jacobs in September 2021 restraining proceedings from being brought in Canada and enforcing the exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies.



Payment Fraud landscape shaped by technology in 2021

Payment systems across Europe are under increased pressure to mitigate fraud risks and defend against persistent attacks from enablers using ever more sophisticated and malicious viruses and malware.


Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up