0370 270 6000

Heckman v Hounslow LBC

2 November 2000
The issues

Gale -v- Superdrug – admissions – attempts to resile from admissions

The facts

The Claimant had an RTA in February 1996. The insurer admitted liability in an open letter. The Claimant indicated he would therefore take no further steps on liability. There was an issue as to the tracing of a vehicle involved in the accident. Negotiations ensued but proceedings were issued in February 1999. The admission was relied upon in the Particulars. The Defence denied liability. The Claimant argued that if the brake failure on which the denial was now based had been raised previously the Claimant would have commenced action against MIB in respect of the other un-traced vehicle. He could no longer do so. The Defendant sought to rely upon Gale. (There is no indication as to whether this was a fast track or multi track case).

The decision

Gale did not survive the coming into force of the new rules as the new rules purposes was to make litigation more certain. Rule 14 gave the Court the power to admit a party to withdraw from an admission but the burden rested upon the party applying.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Court of Appeal confirms exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies in Canadian pipeline dispute

On 10 June 2022 the Court of Appeal upheld an anti-suit injunction granted in favour of insurers by Mr Justice Jacobs in September 2021 restraining proceedings from being brought in Canada and enforcing the exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies.



Payment Fraud landscape shaped by technology in 2021

Payment systems across Europe are under increased pressure to mitigate fraud risks and defend against persistent attacks from enablers using ever more sophisticated and malicious viruses and malware.


Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up