0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Flack v Hudson

27 November 2000
The issues

Animals Act 1971 – injury to rider – whether owner of horse “keeper”.

The facts

The Claimant sued under the Fatal Accident Act 1976 as widower of Shirley Ann Flack, Salli Jane Hudson. The rider was thrown whilst riding with the owners consent. The horse had the propensity to be frightened of farm machinery. The rider had not been told.

The decision

The Defendant was the keeper. The deceased was also a keeper for the purposes of Section 6 (3) of the Animals Act. There was nothing in the construction of the act to prevent one keeper suing another keeper.

The Judge had found as a fact that the horse was frightened of farm machinery. This was clearly an abnormal characteristic within the meaning of Section 2 (2).

The Defendant’s appeal dismissed.

focus on...

Legal updates

Contingent loss in negligence claims

Contingent loss is relevant to limitation; specifically, the date at which a claimant’s cause of action accrues for the purposes of a claim in the tort of negligence (as many claims against professional advisers are framed).


Legal updates

Legal and regulatory monthly update - September 2019

The latest update covering delegated authority, insurance product development, the senior insurance managers regime, data protection, operational control frameworks, Lloyds market, and horizon scanning.


Legal updates

Kuoni referred to the CJEU by Supreme Court for clarification - possible impact on breach of contract, vicarious liability and assumption of responsibility claims for sexual abuse and assault

We were hoping to be able to give you some interesting insights following the judgment of X v Kuoni Travel Ltd but that will have to wait for another day.


Legal updates

The disappearance of LIBOR

Companies should undertake a comprehensive review and audit to identify those products and legacy contracts that are LIBOR-linked and carry out an in-depth risk assessment of discontinuation. Where possible, companies should look at appointing an individual to oversee the programme.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up