0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Cheng I Food Co Ltd v Theotoko Maritime Inc, Queen's Bench Division, 21 July 2000

2 November 2000
The issues

Striking out – delay – prejudice.

The facts

Commercial claim – the Claimants were purchasers of a cargo of maize, brought an action against the owners of a vessel. Points of claim were served in March 1996 and were amended in August 1996. In September 1996 they were served and Lists exchanged in January 1997. There was a delay in the process of inspection. In March 2000 CMC was requested. The Claimant applied pursuant to Pat 3 Rule 3.4.(2)(c) for the claim to be struck out on the ground inter alia that undue delay had caused prejudice. In particular the ships Master now resident in Greece was no longer willing to appear at Court.

The decision

The Application would be allowed. There had been a substantial and unjustified delay. The delay had caused prejudice. Although the ship’s Master had provided a statement it was important for the evidence to be given orally in this case and for an opportunity to be available for cross examination. Having regard to the length of delay and lack of explanation – the nature of the claim and the overriding objective of the rules – it was appropriate that the action should be struck out.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


Legal updates

Non-payment of insurance premiums during the Coronavirus pandemic

The forced closure of many businesses as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recent reports from the Office for National Statistics state that the economy was 25% smaller in April than it was in February this year.


Legal updates

Reinstatement for property damage losses – when does it apply?

The Court of Appeal has recently considered the correct test for measuring the indemnity for property damage losses and has provided useful guidance on whether an insured needs to intend to reinstate the property to its pre-loss condition.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up