0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Wandsworth London Borough Council v Rail Track Plc H.C

18 October 2000
The issues

Nuisance – Wild Animals on Property – Land Owners Responsibility

The facts

Rail Track owned a bridge over Balham High Road. Pigeons congregated underneath the bridge. Their droppings “affected” pedestrians who passed under the bridge. Wandsworth sued Rail Track for: –

1. Public nuisance
2. Private nuisance
3. Negligence

The decision

The Pigeon infestation and consequent fouling of the footpath amounted to a nuisance. The pigeons “substantially interfered with the comfort and convenience of the public”.

Rail Track made no unnatural or unreasonable use of its land.

The case fell squarely within the category of “liability for things naturally on land”.

Although Raul Track had no control over the general pigeon population, it could have prevented pigeons roosting under the bridge. Although Rail Track had not caused the nuisance they had failed to remedy it within a reasonable time or at all. There was no distinction in law between nuisances consisting of physical damage to property and inconvenience or interference with comfort. The public nuisance had been proved.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


Legal updates

Non-payment of insurance premiums during the Coronavirus pandemic

The forced closure of many businesses as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recent reports from the Office for National Statistics state that the economy was 25% smaller in April than it was in February this year.


Legal updates

Reinstatement for property damage losses – when does it apply?

The Court of Appeal has recently considered the correct test for measuring the indemnity for property damage losses and has provided useful guidance on whether an insured needs to intend to reinstate the property to its pre-loss condition.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up