0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

MacDonald v Richmond Boat Project, County Court, 16 March 2000

15 September 2000
The issues

Whether a Part 36 payment had to be broken down and whether a global settlement offer was acceptable.

The facts

A Part 36 Offer was made to settle the whole claim later supported by a payment into Court. The claimant requested a breakdown saying that he could not be properly advised without it. That application was rejected on the basis that there was no power in the Civil Procedure Rules to seek breakdown but only a power to seek clarification.

The decision

The Defendant was entitled to make the offer that had been made. The interests of justice were served by such an offer. It had never been the Defendant’s intention to distinguish between general and special damages. To order it to make such a distinction was entirely artificial.

focus on...

Legal updates

Contingent loss in negligence claims

Contingent loss is relevant to limitation; specifically, the date at which a claimant’s cause of action accrues for the purposes of a claim in the tort of negligence (as many claims against professional advisers are framed).


Legal updates

Legal and regulatory monthly update - September 2019

The latest update covering delegated authority, insurance product development, the senior insurance managers regime, data protection, operational control frameworks, Lloyds market, and horizon scanning.


Legal updates

Kuoni referred to the CJEU by Supreme Court for clarification - possible impact on breach of contract, vicarious liability and assumption of responsibility claims for sexual abuse and assault

We were hoping to be able to give you some interesting insights following the judgment of X v Kuoni Travel Ltd but that will have to wait for another day.


Legal updates

The disappearance of LIBOR

Companies should undertake a comprehensive review and audit to identify those products and legacy contracts that are LIBOR-linked and carry out an in-depth risk assessment of discontinuation. Where possible, companies should look at appointing an individual to oversee the programme.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up