0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Claimant alleges injury to mental health caused by work related stress.

21 September 2000
The issues


The facts

Claimant alleges injury to mental health caused by work related stress.

The decision

Following White -v- Chief Constable South Yorkshire Police the Claimant had to show that he had suffered from a recognised psychiatric illness not merely an emotional reaction to the events or conduct in question. Such injury had to be reasonable foreseeable as a consequence of the act or remission complained off. On the case of an employment stress case it was necessary for the Claimant to show that some injury was reasonable foreseeable to persons in the same class of employment as the Claimant or alternatively that it was necessary to show that there was a foreseeable risk of injury to the pursuer if the pursuer had a known propensity to suffering psychiatric injuries in certain circumstances. See Walker -v- Northumberland County Council.

It was crucial to recognise that the duty involved was not one not to cause stress but was one not to cause recognised psychiatric illness. Accordingly foreseeability had a part to play.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


Legal updates

Non-payment of insurance premiums during the Coronavirus pandemic

The forced closure of many businesses as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recent reports from the Office for National Statistics state that the economy was 25% smaller in April than it was in February this year.


Legal updates

Reinstatement for property damage losses – when does it apply?

The Court of Appeal has recently considered the correct test for measuring the indemnity for property damage losses and has provided useful guidance on whether an insured needs to intend to reinstate the property to its pre-loss condition.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up