0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Kamania v Metro Line

15 September 2000
The issues

Costs – Small Claims – whether full costs should be allowed where no allocation to the small claims track is made.

The facts

Claimant sued Defendant after road traffic accident. Liability admitted. £2144 offered in settlement. Neither party filed an Allocation Questionnaire. Summary Judgment was obtained and an Order made that “the Defendant must pay the Claimant an amount which the Court will decide, and costs”; no further directions given – matter never referred to the Small Claims Track. Claimant accepted the offer but indicated that he would be seeking full costs. Defendant relied on Civil Procedure Rules 1998 Part 26 Practice Direction 26 paragraph 12.8 (this relates to Disposal Hearings – see 12.8.3 “if the Court does not give directions and does not allocate the Claim to the Small Claims Track, it may nonetheless order that the amount payable is to be decided there and then without allocating the Claim to another Track”). Defendant argued that it was unreasonable to allow costs merely because the Defendant had entered a Defence admitting liability – this was against the spirits of the Woolf reforms and principles of keeping costs to a minimum.

The decision

Application for Scale 1 Costs dismissed “in the particular circumstances fixed costs only were appropriate”.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


Legal updates

Non-payment of insurance premiums during the Coronavirus pandemic

The forced closure of many businesses as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recent reports from the Office for National Statistics state that the economy was 25% smaller in April than it was in February this year.


Legal updates

Reinstatement for property damage losses – when does it apply?

The Court of Appeal has recently considered the correct test for measuring the indemnity for property damage losses and has provided useful guidance on whether an insured needs to intend to reinstate the property to its pre-loss condition.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up