0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Gregory v Bartlett (deceased)

15 September 2000
The issues

Whether a late amendment increasing the value of the claim should be allowed and whether in those circumstances a Trial date should be vacated.

The facts

The Claimant was injured in accident in 1996. Proceedings issued in 1998 limiting the claim to £50,000. In October 1999 a Schedule was served to claim for loss of earnings of £40,000. In January 2000 the District Judge gave Claimant permission to update the Schedule allowing him until March to do so. That date was extended by agreement to early April. The claim was produced reducing the Schedule produced in March reducing the claim for lost earnings to £29,000. An assessment was set for May. In April at a telephone Hearing the District Judge allowed an amendment to the Schedule increasing the claim to £135,000 on the basis that recent evidence showed that the earnings of a roofer were greater than that pleaded. The order vacated the trial. The Defendant appealed.

The decision

It was wholly inappropriate to allow the amendment and the consequent vacation of the trial. It was far too late to allow all previous calculations of the claim to be abandoned. The explanation that the employment expert had tried several times to get hold of a witness but had failed was deemed unsatisfactory.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.

View

Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.

View

Legal updates

Non-payment of insurance premiums during the Coronavirus pandemic

The forced closure of many businesses as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recent reports from the Office for National Statistics state that the economy was 25% smaller in April than it was in February this year.

View

Legal updates

Reinstatement for property damage losses – when does it apply?

The Court of Appeal has recently considered the correct test for measuring the indemnity for property damage losses and has provided useful guidance on whether an insured needs to intend to reinstate the property to its pre-loss condition.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up