0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Dobwell v Thanet District Council

15 September 2000
The issues

Occupiers liability – Claimant falling down a flight of stairs.

The facts

Claimant fell down a flight of stairs leading to a public lavatory late at night. The premises were locked and the stairway was unlit. The Claimant bought a claim for damages in negligence and breach of duty under the Occupiers Liability Act 1984 contending that premises had not been lit properly nor that a warning been given that the premises were closed by placing a gate across the entry. The Claimant’s evidence was that she had drunk a relatively small amount of alcohol and because of the lack of light had been unable to see the handrail that was present. She said that she “expected” the premises to be safe. The Defendant contended that the Claimant was volenti to the risk in that she used the stairs knowing they were unlit and that she was contributory negligent in that she did not look where she was going and did not appreciate from the time and the absence of light that the lavatories were closed.

The decision

The claim was dismissed. The Claimant had voluntarily accepted the risk of injury by using the stairs in the darkness and without taking proper care for her own safety. Moreover the A&E note showed that the Claimant had consumed a far greater quantity of alcohol than she admitted in her evidence which impinged upon her credibility. If the finding of the volenti was wrong the Claimant would be contributorily negligent to a high degree.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


Legal updates

Non-payment of insurance premiums during the Coronavirus pandemic

The forced closure of many businesses as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recent reports from the Office for National Statistics state that the economy was 25% smaller in April than it was in February this year.


Legal updates

Reinstatement for property damage losses – when does it apply?

The Court of Appeal has recently considered the correct test for measuring the indemnity for property damage losses and has provided useful guidance on whether an insured needs to intend to reinstate the property to its pre-loss condition.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up