0370 270 6000

Dobwell v Thanet District Council

15 September 2000
The issues

Occupiers liability – Claimant falling down a flight of stairs.

The facts

Claimant fell down a flight of stairs leading to a public lavatory late at night. The premises were locked and the stairway was unlit. The Claimant bought a claim for damages in negligence and breach of duty under the Occupiers Liability Act 1984 contending that premises had not been lit properly nor that a warning been given that the premises were closed by placing a gate across the entry. The Claimant’s evidence was that she had drunk a relatively small amount of alcohol and because of the lack of light had been unable to see the handrail that was present. She said that she “expected” the premises to be safe. The Defendant contended that the Claimant was volenti to the risk in that she used the stairs knowing they were unlit and that she was contributory negligent in that she did not look where she was going and did not appreciate from the time and the absence of light that the lavatories were closed.

The decision

The claim was dismissed. The Claimant had voluntarily accepted the risk of injury by using the stairs in the darkness and without taking proper care for her own safety. Moreover the A&E note showed that the Claimant had consumed a far greater quantity of alcohol than she admitted in her evidence which impinged upon her credibility. If the finding of the volenti was wrong the Claimant would be contributorily negligent to a high degree.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Court of Appeal confirms exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies in Canadian pipeline dispute

On 10 June 2022 the Court of Appeal upheld an anti-suit injunction granted in favour of insurers by Mr Justice Jacobs in September 2021 restraining proceedings from being brought in Canada and enforcing the exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies.



Payment Fraud landscape shaped by technology in 2021

Payment systems across Europe are under increased pressure to mitigate fraud risks and defend against persistent attacks from enablers using ever more sophisticated and malicious viruses and malware.


Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up