0370 270 6000

Bordin v St Mary's NHS Trust

15 September 2000
The issues

Fatal accident – calculation of past and future dependency – how a deceased mother’s services should be valued.

The facts

The Claimant’s wife died from injuries sustained in the process of the treatment during labour at the Hospital. In the course of the treatment a child was born. Judgment was entered in favour of the Claimant once proceedings were issued. The Claimant failed to attend and the child was joined as a second Claimant in order to preserve his rights. At the reconvened Assessment Hearing the Claimant failed to attend and the Claimant’s case was dismissed but the dismissal postponed until after the assessment of the second Claimant’s loss.

The straightforward issue was as follows:-

It was contended on behalf of the second Claimant, the infant, the appropriate measure for past and future care should be based upon the actual care since the death of the mother both paid and unpaid. The Defendant argued the proper basis for calculating past and future dependency was the care the mother would have in fact provided.

The decision

The correct basis was to have regard to the care actually provided. Stanley -v- Saddique followed. There was clear authority for allowing the expenses incurred through the employment of a Nanny even when one had not in fact been employed. It followed that there was even stronger reason for compensating for the expense when one actually been employed – this included the payment of a Nanny’s travelling expenditure.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Court of Appeal confirms exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies in Canadian pipeline dispute

On 10 June 2022 the Court of Appeal upheld an anti-suit injunction granted in favour of insurers by Mr Justice Jacobs in September 2021 restraining proceedings from being brought in Canada and enforcing the exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies.



Payment Fraud landscape shaped by technology in 2021

Payment systems across Europe are under increased pressure to mitigate fraud risks and defend against persistent attacks from enablers using ever more sophisticated and malicious viruses and malware.


Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up