0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Nelson v Chief Constable of Cumbria

15 August 2000
The issues

Police Officers – Duty of Care – Extent Of Duty Owed to Road Users When Not Engaged In Pursuit.

The facts

The Claimant was driving a distinctive car, a vehicle similar to which he had used on previous occasions to speed away from Police vehicles. A Police Officer in a transit van followed the car indicating that it should stop when about 5 to 6 lengths behind and for 50 – 60 metres at 30 – 40 mph. The Claimant performed an emergency stop. The Police vehicle collided with the rear of the car. Minor damage was done and some injury to the Claimant. The Claimant brought an action against the Chief Constable.

The decision

The Police owed the same duty of care as any other driver. This was not a case of pursuit or over excessive speed. Consequently the collision was prima facia evidence of negligence which would require strong evidence in rebuttal to avoid liability. There was none here. However, an unexplained emergency stop was also negligent in the circumstances and the Claimant was found 25% contributorily negligent.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.

View

Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.

View

Legal updates

Non-payment of insurance premiums during the Coronavirus pandemic

The forced closure of many businesses as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recent reports from the Office for National Statistics state that the economy was 25% smaller in April than it was in February this year.

View

Legal updates

Reinstatement for property damage losses – when does it apply?

The Court of Appeal has recently considered the correct test for measuring the indemnity for property damage losses and has provided useful guidance on whether an insured needs to intend to reinstate the property to its pre-loss condition.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up