0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Alan v Whittle

7 August 2000
The issues

Costs – Payment into Court – subsequent attempt to reduce payment – effects on costs orders following judgment

The facts

The Claimant brought an action against the Defendant for damages following a road traffic accident including a claim for credit hire. The Defendants paid £5,500.00 in to Court prior to Dimond v Lovell. After Dimond v Lovell they indicated that they wished to retract their Payment In and indicated that the offer was reduced to £2,500.00. The Defendant’s solicitors did not apply for leave to reduce the Payment In.

At Trial the Claimant was awarded £5,498.00. The District Judge ordered the Claimant to pay the Defendant’s costs from the date of the Payment In. The Claimant appealed.

The decision

The District Judge’s exercise of the discretion was wrong in principle. The Defendant’s solicitors had represented that the money in Court should be regarded as having been reduced to £2,500.00 and although the Claimant did not apply to take the Payment out the Court was satisfied that had he done so, the Defendant would have objected and successfully reduced the Payment In. The correct order was for the Claimant to have his costs of the Trial save for that period of time during which the full Payment Into Court was available for acceptance in respect of which short period the Claimant would pay the Defendant’s costs.

focus on...

Legal updates

Insurance annual review 2019-2020

Welcome to our review of 2019 as we look ahead to what is on the horizon for the insurance sector in 2020.


Legal updates

Financial Services – ‘Duty of Care’ Bill: consumer protection or damp squib?

The Financial Services Duty of Care Bill (the “Bill”) was introduced into the House of Lords in October 2019 and had its second reading on 9 January 2020.


Legal updates

Noise-induced hearing loss claims – documentation and the expert engineer

Guest writer, Finch Consulting Senior Consultant Teli Chinelis applies his expertise in preparing engineering reports in relation to noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) claims to explain information that is required from the claimant and information that is required and is advisable to be retained by employers, in order to ensure that claims can be fairly represented.


Legal updates

SRA Standards and Regulations November 2019

On Monday 25 November the 2011 SRA Handbook is replaced by the 2019 SRA Standards and Regulations (often referred to as STARS).This is the 26th version of the Code of Conduct for Solicitors.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up