0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Alan v Whittle

7 August 2000
The issues

Costs – Payment into Court – subsequent attempt to reduce payment – effects on costs orders following judgment

The facts

The Claimant brought an action against the Defendant for damages following a road traffic accident including a claim for credit hire. The Defendants paid £5,500.00 in to Court prior to Dimond v Lovell. After Dimond v Lovell they indicated that they wished to retract their Payment In and indicated that the offer was reduced to £2,500.00. The Defendant’s solicitors did not apply for leave to reduce the Payment In.

At Trial the Claimant was awarded £5,498.00. The District Judge ordered the Claimant to pay the Defendant’s costs from the date of the Payment In. The Claimant appealed.

The decision

The District Judge’s exercise of the discretion was wrong in principle. The Defendant’s solicitors had represented that the money in Court should be regarded as having been reduced to £2,500.00 and although the Claimant did not apply to take the Payment out the Court was satisfied that had he done so, the Defendant would have objected and successfully reduced the Payment In. The correct order was for the Claimant to have his costs of the Trial save for that period of time during which the full Payment Into Court was available for acceptance in respect of which short period the Claimant would pay the Defendant’s costs.

focus on...

Legal updates

Contingent loss in negligence claims

Contingent loss is relevant to limitation; specifically, the date at which a claimant’s cause of action accrues for the purposes of a claim in the tort of negligence (as many claims against professional advisers are framed).

View

Legal updates

Legal and regulatory monthly update - September 2019

The latest update covering delegated authority, insurance product development, the senior insurance managers regime, data protection, operational control frameworks, Lloyds market, and horizon scanning.

View

Legal updates

Kuoni referred to the CJEU by Supreme Court for clarification - possible impact on breach of contract, vicarious liability and assumption of responsibility claims for sexual abuse and assault

We were hoping to be able to give you some interesting insights following the judgment of X v Kuoni Travel Ltd but that will have to wait for another day.

View

Legal updates

The disappearance of LIBOR

Companies should undertake a comprehensive review and audit to identify those products and legacy contracts that are LIBOR-linked and carry out an in-depth risk assessment of discontinuation. Where possible, companies should look at appointing an individual to oversee the programme.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up