0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Wright v Manchester City Council

12 June 2000

County Court, 14 December 1999

The issues

Consequences Of Failing To Serve A Cost Schedule In A Fast Track Case

The facts

The successful Defendant failed to serve a Costs Schedule. A hand written Costs Schedule was provided by the end of the Trial. The Claimant argued that as the rules had not been complied with there should be no Order for costs. The Defendant argued that the costs could be assessed by the Trial Judge or listed for a Detailed Assessment. The Judge decided Summary Assessment was inappropriate and that there should be no order for costs as the Defendant was in breach of the rules and the practice direction. The Defendant appealed.

The decision

The Appeal was dismissed. The Trial Judge’s decision could only be interfered with if he had erred in law or unreasonably exercised his discretion. The Costs Schedule had not been served within 24 hours of the hearing and there had been a breach of the practice direction therefore.

The Trial Judge had discretion on costs and had acted within the rules. The Order could not be interfered with and it was not relevant to consider the argument on the ground of proportionality.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


Legal updates

Non-payment of insurance premiums during the Coronavirus pandemic

The forced closure of many businesses as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recent reports from the Office for National Statistics state that the economy was 25% smaller in April than it was in February this year.


Legal updates

Reinstatement for property damage losses – when does it apply?

The Court of Appeal has recently considered the correct test for measuring the indemnity for property damage losses and has provided useful guidance on whether an insured needs to intend to reinstate the property to its pre-loss condition.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up