0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Transports Frigoriphiques Laurent v Transportes Olloquiegui

12 June 2000
The issues

Following a Leading Vehicle – Motorway

The facts

An accident occurred between the TFL’s lorry and the TO’s lorry.

The TO’s lorry was accepted as being defective due to the negligence of another party. The defect triggered emergency brakes and caused the lorry to come to an abrupt and immediate halt without the rear brake lights coming on. Between the TO’s lorry and the TFL’s lorry were two private cars. The TFL’s lorry was travelling at about 50 mph. The cars pulled over to the hard shoulder and stopped. The driver of the TFL’s lorry could neither pull over to the hard shoulder where the cars were now stationery or into the right hand fast lane where cars were travelling in the same direction. The lorry began to brake but was unable to come to a halt before colliding heavily with the rear of the TO’s lorry causing damage to the TFL’s lorry and slight damage to the TO’s lorry. The TO argued that the TFL’s driver should have known to keep at a safe distance and speed from the leading vehicle and that the speed that he was travelling at should have been such as to allow him to stop the vehicle in the case of an emergency. The TFL argued that there was such an immediate stop that the accident was inevitable and unavoidable and that no amount of skill or road awareness on behalf of the following driver could have avoided it.

The decision

1. Safe driving speeds and distances were speeds at which a driver was capable of dealing with foreseeable emergencies.

2. The abrupt and immediate halt of the TO’s lorry was not a foreseeable occurrence.

3. The fact that the halt was abrupt and immediate was supported by the fact that the following cars only had to pull onto the hard shoulder rather than apply their brakes.

focus on...

Legal updates

Contingent loss in negligence claims

Contingent loss is relevant to limitation; specifically, the date at which a claimant’s cause of action accrues for the purposes of a claim in the tort of negligence (as many claims against professional advisers are framed).

View

Legal updates

Legal and regulatory monthly update - September 2019

The latest update covering delegated authority, insurance product development, the senior insurance managers regime, data protection, operational control frameworks, Lloyds market, and horizon scanning.

View

Legal updates

Kuoni referred to the CJEU by Supreme Court for clarification - possible impact on breach of contract, vicarious liability and assumption of responsibility claims for sexual abuse and assault

We were hoping to be able to give you some interesting insights following the judgment of X v Kuoni Travel Ltd but that will have to wait for another day.

View

Legal updates

The disappearance of LIBOR

Companies should undertake a comprehensive review and audit to identify those products and legacy contracts that are LIBOR-linked and carry out an in-depth risk assessment of discontinuation. Where possible, companies should look at appointing an individual to oversee the programme.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up