0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Jenny v North Lincolnshire County Council Court of Appeal

12 June 2000
The issues

Duty of Care – Child estranged from School onto Highway – Knocked down by Car – Liability of Education Authority

The facts

An 8 year old child suffering from “global development delay” could not safely be allowed out of school on his own. The school had 5 gates. All gates were to be kept closed and teachers were to close them when they found them open. During break time children were in the playground under supervision. No one had responsibility for checking whether the gates were closed before break. During afternoon break the Claimant left the school on its own through one of the five gates. He had travelled approximately 1000 metres from the school when he was knocked down by a car on a main road.

The decision

The Judge as a preliminary issue, found the school in breach of their duty to establish a system for ensuring as far as practicable that all 5 gates were kept closed and fastened during school hours and particularly at breaks and that the system of relying teachers to shut gates if and when they found them open was insufficient having regard to the risk of accidents of children without road sense getting onto the main road. The Local Education Authority appealed the decision. The appeal would be dismissed. The school could not say how the Claimant had come to be out on the road and since the school had been unable to satisfy the Court that it had taken all reasonable precautions to prevent children who would have been at risk in traffic getting out unaccompanyined the school had failed to discharge the evidential burden of showing that the accident was not due to its negligence. That the maxim res ipsa locquiter applied and that the Claimant was not required to establish that any particular set of facts caused the accident.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


Legal updates

Non-payment of insurance premiums during the Coronavirus pandemic

The forced closure of many businesses as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recent reports from the Office for National Statistics state that the economy was 25% smaller in April than it was in February this year.


Legal updates

Reinstatement for property damage losses – when does it apply?

The Court of Appeal has recently considered the correct test for measuring the indemnity for property damage losses and has provided useful guidance on whether an insured needs to intend to reinstate the property to its pre-loss condition.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up