0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

David Hallam Limited v Langford

12 June 2000
The issues

Validity of a Part 36 Offer failing to comply with the formalities at Rule 35.5 (6) (b)

The facts

8 months before Trial the Claimant wrote a letter expressed to be a “formal offer made under Part 36 Civil Procedure Rules” and complied in all respects save but did not state that after 21 days the Offeree could only accept the offer if the parties agreed the liabilty of costs or the costs gave permission. On the morning of the trial the Defendant gave notice of acceptance. The Claimant asserted in the absence of words required that the letter by the rule that the letter was not a valid Part 36 Offer and was not capable of acceptance.

The decision

1. The use of the word “formal” on the fact of the letter was not enough to include my inference the required words.

2. The Claimant was not estopped from denying the insertion on the face of the letter that it was a Part 36 Offer.

3. It was not open to the Defendant to waive the apparent procedural irregularity.

4. The requirement to specify the information in Part 36 Rule 36.5(6) (b) was directory not mandatory in the absence of that information was not fatal. The letter therefore was a valid Part 36 Offer which had been accepted.

focus on...

Legal updates

Contingent loss in negligence claims

Contingent loss is relevant to limitation; specifically, the date at which a claimant’s cause of action accrues for the purposes of a claim in the tort of negligence (as many claims against professional advisers are framed).

View

Legal updates

Legal and regulatory monthly update - September 2019

The latest update covering delegated authority, insurance product development, the senior insurance managers regime, data protection, operational control frameworks, Lloyds market, and horizon scanning.

View

Legal updates

Kuoni referred to the CJEU by Supreme Court for clarification - possible impact on breach of contract, vicarious liability and assumption of responsibility claims for sexual abuse and assault

We were hoping to be able to give you some interesting insights following the judgment of X v Kuoni Travel Ltd but that will have to wait for another day.

View

Legal updates

The disappearance of LIBOR

Companies should undertake a comprehensive review and audit to identify those products and legacy contracts that are LIBOR-linked and carry out an in-depth risk assessment of discontinuation. Where possible, companies should look at appointing an individual to oversee the programme.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up