0370 270 6000

Curry's Group v Martin QBD

1 June 2000
The issues

Landlord and Tenant – Rent Dispute

The facts

The Claimant was a tenant of the retail premises with a 25 year lease with 5 yearly rent review. The Defendant was appointed as an independent expert to carry out the first rent review. A dispute arose between the Claimant and the Landlord as to the rent.

The Defendant took Counsel’s advice on the interpretation of the rent review clause and determined the rent at a figure although he recognised that figure to be above the true rental value. The Claimant brought an action claiming the Defendant had been negligent in his enquiries and his assessment.

The decision

Dismissing the claim. The Defendant’s role was more that of a Surveyor valuing a properly and buy its nature this role did not lend itself to absolute precision. See Merrivale Moore Plc v Stratton Parker. It was not a matter of showing a mathematical error therefore. The Claimants had to show that the Defendant’s assessment was one which no reasonable Surveyor would have made. The method he had used was arguably one that might have been employed by some surveyors of the necessary competence.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Court of Appeal confirms exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies in Canadian pipeline dispute

On 10 June 2022 the Court of Appeal upheld an anti-suit injunction granted in favour of insurers by Mr Justice Jacobs in September 2021 restraining proceedings from being brought in Canada and enforcing the exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies.



Payment Fraud landscape shaped by technology in 2021

Payment systems across Europe are under increased pressure to mitigate fraud risks and defend against persistent attacks from enablers using ever more sophisticated and malicious viruses and malware.


Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up