0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Koonjul v Thames Link Healthcare Services NHS Trust, Court of Appeal

26 May 2000
The issues

Residential Home – level of risk

The facts

The Claimant worked as a Care Assistant at the Rainbow Lodge, Dartford a small residential home for children and sustained a back injury when making an unusually low bed. The issue arose as to precise evaluation of the level of risk involved in carrying out a number of everyday manual handling operations with precise warnings to each employee and as to what extent this was impracticable.

The decision

(i) To bring the case within Regulation 4 there had to be a real risk – a foreseeable possibility of injury and certainly nothing approaching a probability.

(ii) Making such an assessment the employer was not entitled to assume that all employers would on all occasions behave with care for their own safety.

(iii) The purpose of the Regulation was to place on employers an obligation to look after their employees safely which they might not otherwise have;

(iv) There had to be an element of realism however.

(v) This case involved a small residential home with a small number of employees carrying out everyday tasks and a particular employee who had been carrying out such tasks for a long time. The employer in assessing the risks was entitled to take that into account.

(vi) It was arguable that the act of bending down to pull away a bed from a wall involved an element of risk.

(vii) That the obligation was to reduce risk to the lowest level reasonably practicable. This particular employees work involved a number of particular tasks, any one of which could be described as manual handling – lifting bedding moving beds around, moving chests of drawers and moving chairs. The idea of the level of risk involved (very low) should be met by a precise evaluation of each of those tasks and precise warnings to each employee as to how each was to be carried out was beyond the realms of practicability.

Comments

See also Rowe -v- Swansea City at April CL480

focus on...

Legal updates

Contingent loss in negligence claims

Contingent loss is relevant to limitation; specifically, the date at which a claimant’s cause of action accrues for the purposes of a claim in the tort of negligence (as many claims against professional advisers are framed).

View

Legal updates

Legal and regulatory monthly update - September 2019

The latest update covering delegated authority, insurance product development, the senior insurance managers regime, data protection, operational control frameworks, Lloyds market, and horizon scanning.

View

Legal updates

Kuoni referred to the CJEU by Supreme Court for clarification - possible impact on breach of contract, vicarious liability and assumption of responsibility claims for sexual abuse and assault

We were hoping to be able to give you some interesting insights following the judgment of X v Kuoni Travel Ltd but that will have to wait for another day.

View

Legal updates

The disappearance of LIBOR

Companies should undertake a comprehensive review and audit to identify those products and legacy contracts that are LIBOR-linked and carry out an in-depth risk assessment of discontinuation. Where possible, companies should look at appointing an individual to oversee the programme.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up