0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Koonjul v Thames Link Healthcare Services NHS Trust, Court of Appeal

26 May 2000
The issues

Residential Home – level of risk

The facts

The Claimant worked as a Care Assistant at the Rainbow Lodge, Dartford a small residential home for children and sustained a back injury when making an unusually low bed. The issue arose as to precise evaluation of the level of risk involved in carrying out a number of everyday manual handling operations with precise warnings to each employee and as to what extent this was impracticable.

The decision

(i) To bring the case within Regulation 4 there had to be a real risk – a foreseeable possibility of injury and certainly nothing approaching a probability.

(ii) Making such an assessment the employer was not entitled to assume that all employers would on all occasions behave with care for their own safety.

(iii) The purpose of the Regulation was to place on employers an obligation to look after their employees safely which they might not otherwise have;

(iv) There had to be an element of realism however.

(v) This case involved a small residential home with a small number of employees carrying out everyday tasks and a particular employee who had been carrying out such tasks for a long time. The employer in assessing the risks was entitled to take that into account.

(vi) It was arguable that the act of bending down to pull away a bed from a wall involved an element of risk.

(vii) That the obligation was to reduce risk to the lowest level reasonably practicable. This particular employees work involved a number of particular tasks, any one of which could be described as manual handling – lifting bedding moving beds around, moving chests of drawers and moving chairs. The idea of the level of risk involved (very low) should be met by a precise evaluation of each of those tasks and precise warnings to each employee as to how each was to be carried out was beyond the realms of practicability.

Comments

See also Rowe -v- Swansea City at April CL480

focus on...

Legal updates

Non-payment of insurance premiums during the Coronavirus pandemic

The forced closure of many businesses as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recent reports from the Office for National Statistics state that the economy was 25% smaller in April than it was in February this year.

View

Legal updates

Reinstatement for property damage losses – when does it apply?

The Court of Appeal has recently considered the correct test for measuring the indemnity for property damage losses and has provided useful guidance on whether an insured needs to intend to reinstate the property to its pre-loss condition.

View

Legal updates

Coronavirus (COVID-19) insurance considerations

With instances of COVID-19 rapidly increasing throughout the UK, many businesses are considering the options available to limit staff and customer exposure to Coronavirus.

View

Legal updates

Insurance annual review 2019-2020

Welcome to our review of 2019 as we look ahead to what is on the horizon for the insurance sector in 2020.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up