0370 270 6000

Vibration claims - frequency is key

8 February 2018

The Court of Appeal handed down judgment in the interesting case of Adrian Bowe v Mersey Rewinds Engineering Ltd & Ors (2018) last week. Three defendant companies who had employed the claimant over his working life appealed against a finding that they were in breach of their duty of care regarding exposure to vibration.

The court at first instance found that the claimant had been exposed to vibrating tools occasionally and that from time to time this exposure would exceed threshold levels. There was also a finding that in the absence of any warnings or monitoring that the employers were in breach of their duty of care.

The key issue was whether the occasional exposure was enough for breach to be upheld. The Court of Appeal found it was not and that frequency of use was a vital component to illustrating breach of duty. A lack of warnings or vibration monitoring is only a breach of duty when coupled with frequent exposure to vibrating tools above the threshold limit.

This serves as an important reminder to scrutinise a claimant’s exposure levels. Any exposure which can be categorised as 'infrequent' may well provide an opportunity to defend such claims on liability. With the benefit of good evidence of the claimant’s tool usage and vibration output of the tools, with supporting engineering and witness evidence, there is good reason for defendants to maintain a robust repudiation.

Related opinions

Employers liability for practical jokes in the workplace

The extent of vicarious liability has been tested by the courts again and this time in relation to employees engaging in horseplay and practical jokes.

View blog

Landlord and tenant inspections - getting the evidence right

In Rogerson v Bolsover District Council (2019) the Court of Appeal found against a local authority landlord pursuant to the Defective Premises Act 1972 following a finding of an inadequate inspection regime.

View blog

Applying QOCS protection in a claim for personal injury and something else

In The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v Brown [2018], the High Court ruled that a Circuit Judge was wrong to automatically apply QOCS protection to a claim for misuse of data which also included a claim for personal injury.

View blog

Personal injury reforms delay

In May 2018 I prepared a blog entitled ‘small claims u-turn?’ after the Justice Select Committee called on the government to put the ex-Chancellor George Osborne’s plans to raise the small claims limit for personal injury claims and prohibit awards of general damages for minor soft tissue injuries on hold whilst the past five years of reforms are evaluated.

View blog

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up