0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Pre-Action Protocol for Debt Claims - a debtors’ charter for delay?

22 March 2017

The Master of the Rolls, Sir Terence Etherton, has finally announced the provisions of the long-awaited Pre-Action Protocol for Debt Claims (“Debt Protocol”) which comes into force on 1 October 2017.

The Debt Protocol applies to any business claiming payment of a debt from an individual, including an individual in business as a sole trader. Other business-to-business debts are not covered. At the heart of the Debt Protocol are a number of aims which typically align with existing protocols in other areas, namely:

  • early exchange of information between the creditor and debtor, in particular to clarify any areas of dispute
  • avoidance of litigation through the agreement of mutually acceptable terms
  • use of ADR as a means of resolution
  • requirements for the parties to act reasonably and proportionately.

The claim process is initiated by a detailed Letter of Claim enclosing various documents which “should” be sent by post, a surprising formality in the growing age of electronic communications. The debtor then has 30 days in which to complete a proforma Reply Form and Financial Means Statement – much longer than many creditors are used to when sending what is traditionally termed a ‘7-day letter’ – failing which the creditor can commence court proceedings. If a debtor indicates that (s)he is seeking debt advice, the creditor should not start court proceedings within 30 days from receiving the Reply Form. Costs penalties can flow from any breaches of the Debt Protocol.

The reduction of court claims and the need to act reasonably in the pre-action phase are both laudable aims. However, many businesses of all sizes will remain strongly opposed to the introduction of the Debt Protocol, just as they were during the consultation stages. Clear opportunities exist for debtors to extend a period of credit by deploying the Debt Protocol effectively.

As many businesses continue to struggle with the economic challenges of Brexit, the likely detrimental effect that the Debt Protocol will have on their lockup will be an unwelcome obstacle, especially for debts where no legitimate reason for non-payment exists. For many businesses, they may ultimately have to weigh up whether the cost of non-compliance with the Debt Protocol is preferable to the continued delay in recovering sums which are lawfully due and undisputed.

focus on...

Legal updates

IPID update January 2018

The FCA has recently published a Policy Statement (PS17/27) entitled ‘Insurance Distribution Directive implementation – Feedback to CP17/23 and near-final rules’.


Legal updates

Commercial Court allows reinsurance claim without evidence of policy document

In October 2017 we reported on this matter in which, at that time, the claimants had applied six weeks before trial for a late amendment to their particulars of claim.


Legal updates

Will fines under the GDPR be insurable?

Where companies might be subject to large fines, there is increasing concern as to whether the fines imposed by the regulator will be insurable, either via a company’s professional indemnity policy or a cyber specific policy.



Two minute guide to damages for late payment and the Enterprise Act

Section 13A Enterprise Act (‘damages for late payment’) has been in effect since 4 May 2017. The new provision applies to all insurance and reinsurance contracts entered into after that date.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.