0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

deferred prosecution agreements

25 January 2017

The High Court’s approval of a Deferred Prosecution Agreement between Rolls Royce and the Serious Fraud Office is only the third such agreement that the SFO has secured. It is however by far and away the largest and most wide ranging.

Under the DPA Rolls Royce agreed to pay a penalty totalling £497m which includes disgorgement of profit and a financial penalty together with payment of a sum towards the SFO’s costs in the region of £13m. Rolls Royce also entered into DPA equivalents in other jurisdictions totalling approximately a further £196m.

Whilst the alleged criminality is wide ranging and includes conspiracy to corrupt, false accounting and failure to prevent bribery, the final penalty in fact reflects a discount for the “extraordinary” cooperation of Rolls Royce during the investigation. That cooperation included carrying out an internal investigation which in fact disclosed details of further bribery and corruption of which the SFO was unaware.

Three points of note:

  1. Despite the DPA with the corporate entity the SFO have made it clear that investigations into individuals continue and indeed one condition of the DPA is that Rolls Royce cooperate in full with any subsequent prosecution of former employees. If prosecution of individuals follows the details of alleged criminality will become more widely publicised.
  2. This penalty will no doubt serve to encourage the use of DPA’s by the SFO which is in accordance with last year’s remarks of the Director of SFO, David Green, that more DPA’s were on the way.
  3. The significant penalty is a reminder to companies of the consequences of failing to have in place robust systems to identify and prevent bribery and corruption. Clear and enforced policies within businesses are key to early identification of attempted or actual wrong doing.

related opinions

SFO fail to secure individual criminal convictions following Deferred Prosecution Agreement

On 16 July 2019 the Serious Fraud Office released details of the Deferred Prosecution Agreement reached with Sarclad Ltd in July 2016.

View blog

Money laundering – a new focus?

It is important to recognise that organisations and individuals do not have to intend to launder money or even to act dishonestly in order to commit money laundering offences.

View blog

Disclosure of material created during internal investigations

The Court of Appeal yesterday handed down one of the most awaited court judgments in recent times, Serious Fraud Office (SFO) v Eurasian Natural Resources Corp. Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 2006.

View blog

NHS Counter Fraud Authority secures first conviction

The NHSCFA has amply demonstrated it has both the appetite and the teeth to fight fraud, and in securing a first conviction as the 'Counter Fraud Authority'.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up