Please sign in with your existing account details.
Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.
Privacy statement - Terms and conditions
Forgotten your password?
You have exceeded the maximum number of login attempts for this email address and your account has been locked. An email has been sent to member of Browne Jacobson's web team and some one will be contacting you over the next two working days with details of how to change your password.
displaying 1-10 of 15
Reset
A recent case (Marsh v Ministry of Justice) has highlighted the problems faced by employers when dealing with disciplinary proceedings against employees.
View publish article
In July 2016, the Supreme Court held by a 4:1 majority that an insurer was not entitled to avoid payment where lies told by an insured were collateral to an otherwise valid claim.
Drones are taking off in a big way and with Christmas fast approaching, sales are likely to increase further as children (‘big kids’ included!) look to get their hands on the latest must-have gadget.
The move towards devolved powers and the rise of super combined authorities raises a number of issues and challenges for both local authorities and their insurers.
Insurance policy wording must be clear and unambiguous – the court will not re-write a contract to save a party from a bad bargain even if the consequences are ‘disastrous’ for one party.
For a period of 27 years from 1961 to 1988 the claimant was employed by the Guernsey Gaslight Company Ltd during which time he was exposed to asbestos dust and later developed the fatal condition of mesothelioma.
This article aims to give some practical tips about asking written questions to psychiatric experts under CPR 35.6, in the particular context of an occupational stress claim.
Over 10 years ago now the Court of Appeal gathered four cases to be heard together with the express intention of providing guidance as to the handling of stress at work cases claims.
Whether or not it is an abuse of process to bring a second claim was the question for Mrs Justice Laing in the case of Lloyd v Humphreys & Glasgow Ltd [2015] EWHC 525.
Following the introduction of Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 (ERRA) the new landscape for personal claims post 1 October 2013 is that such claims are, save for limited exceptions, dependent upon whether the claimant can prove negligence by proving breach of duty and foreseeable risk of injury.
Filter by sector
Filter by service