0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

valuers and insurers breathe a sigh of relief

17 June 2011

Valuers and insurers will breathe a huge sigh of relief after the Court of Appeal limited the duty of care which a valuer owes to a buy-to-let investor.

The decision in Scullion v Bank of Scotland t/as Colleys was handed down this morning by the Court of Appeal.

In 2002 Mr Scullion agreed to buy a two bedroom flat on a buy-to-let basis based on a valuation by Colleys, the Bank of Scotlands valuation wing. In time the valuation turned out to be optimistic, and Scullion sought damages. Colleys denied it owed the usual duty of care because Mr Scullion wasnt a residential buyer and that any duty had been discharged by a disclaimer in the mortgage application.

Whilst the High Court found the surveyors to have owed a duty to the purchaser (who was not their client), the Court of Appeal has today disagreed with that judgement, stating that a valuer of a residential property does not owe the usual duty of care to a borrower if he was instructed by a commercial lender and the borrower is a buy-to-let investor.

Tim Johnson, a lawyer at Browne Jacobson who specialises in professional negligence claims, commented:

"In reaching this decision, the Court of Appeal has ruled that there is a distinction between standard purchasers to whom a duty is owed and buy-to-let investors.

"This decision will be welcomed by valuers and their insurers, who will have been concerned by the earlier High Court decision which, if upheld, could have led to a spike in the number of professional negligence claims in a sector that has already been badly hit by the downturn in the housing market."


6 June 2019

Reaction: Supreme Court rules no duty of care in negligence in Poole Borough Council v GN and another

This morning (6 June) the Supreme Court has handed down its decision in Poole Borough Council v GN and another. The court dismissed the appeal and upheld the decision in the lower court that the claim should be struck out. The claim addresses broad issues with the potential to impact on negligence claims against many public bodies including health and education.

Read more

12 December 2018

Browne Jacobson strengthens growing public sector litigation practice with partner hire

Law firm Browne Jacobson has expanded its public sector insurance litigation practice team with the appointment of partner Cynthia Watts.

Read more

Lakhbir Rakar

Lakhbir Rakar

PR Manager