Please sign in with your existing account details.
Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.
Privacy statement - Terms and conditions
Forgotten your password?
You have exceeded the maximum number of login attempts for this email address and your account has been locked. An email has been sent to member of Browne Jacobson's web team and some one will be contacting you over the next two working days with details of how to change your password.
Are you sure you want to remove this item from you pinned content?
In this video Ben Troke looks at some of the most recent leading cases in relation to the Mental Capacity Act and Deprivation of Liberty, including in particular the Supreme Court’s landmark decision on the involvement of the courts in end of life treatment decisions in 'Re Y.'
Download and share the slides
This case considered whether the High Court’s inherent jurisdiction can be used to authorise a deprivation of liberty of a patient with capacity who is subject to a conditional discharge under the Mental Health Act 1983.
View
This Supreme Court case considered the interplay between Community Treatment Orders under the Mental Health Act 1983 and deprivation of liberty.
With the Supreme Court announcing their decision on the case of MM, Rebecca highlights how neither the mental health Tribunal nor the Secretary of State for Justice have the power to give a patient a conditional discharge under the Mental Health Act where those conditions amount to a deprivation of liberty.
In this webinar, Carl discusses four main topics, minimum wage for sleep-in shifts, recent learning disability and autism CQC registration appeals, the latest on CQC enforcement and CMA advice on care home fees, terms and conditions.
The opinions expressed on this video are provided for the purposes of general interest and information and should not be relied upon. They contain only summaries of aspects of the subject matter at the time of publishing and do not provide comprehensive statements of the law. They do not constitute legal advice and do not provide a substitute for it. So why not talk to us and seek advice that's tailored to you? You can look up one of our experts on this website or call on 0370 270 6000.
Partner
Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.
Sign up