0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Appeal to Supreme Court launched on payment for ‘sleep-in’ shifts

10 August 2018

Unison have confirmed that it will be appealing the Court of Appeal’s ruling that workers are not entitled to be paid for time when they are asleep at work- so called 'sleep-in shifts'.

The Court of Appeal’s ruling relieved employers of a £400m bill to HMRC, amounting to six years of back pay for workers not paid minimum wage for their sleep in shifts. However, that figure may once again become payable if Unison is successful.

It is expected the Supreme Court will grant permission for the appeal to be heard given the significance of the issue. It may, however, be some time before the appeal is heard; Unison believes it may take up to two months for a decision on permission alone.

Employers face more uncertainty on what to pay for sleep-in shifts. Until we have further clarity, employers should consider continuing with any contingency plans they had in place before the Court of Appeal ruling.

Related opinions

Flexible working, childcare and indirect sex discrimination – important reminder

The courts have long recognised that, on a societal level, women bear a greater burden of childcare responsibilities than men which can make it more difficult for women to comply with employer requirements for flexible working (known as the ‘childcare disparity’).

View blog

Mencap case: No entitlement to National Minimum Wage for sleep-in shifts

In a pivotal and much anticipated judgment for the social care sector, the Supreme Court has ruled that workers are not entitled to the National Minimum Wage for all time spent on a sleep-in shift.

View blog

Chief Coroner Guidance - R (on the application of Maughan)

The Chief Coroner has helpfully published new guidance in the form of Law Sheet 6, dealing with the judgment of R (on the application of Maughan) v HM Senior Coroner for Oxfordshire.

View blog

EU has published a redacted version of its contract with UK drug maker AstraZeneca to procure the Covid-19 vaccine

The EU has published a redacted version of its contract with UK drug maker AstraZeneca to procure the Covid-19 vaccine.

View blog

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up