Please sign in with your existing account details.
Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.
Privacy statement - Terms and conditions
Forgotten your password?
You have exceeded the maximum number of login attempts for this email address and your account has been locked. An email has been sent to member of Browne Jacobson's web team and some one will be contacting you over the next two working days with details of how to change your password.
Are you sure you want to remove this item from you pinned content?
The National Audit Office's recent report on contracting with the private sector raises several questions about how outsourcing contracts operate.
In comparing the profitability of public sector contracts with their other activities the NAO concluded the average return made by large outsourcing firms on government contracts is lower than on private sector deals so its difficult to read from this that the public sector is getting a bad deal, but profit margins do vary between contracts.
However the NAO is concerned provisions such as "open-book" accounting, benchmarking and profit-sharing arrangements are used inconsistently across public sector deals.
Given outsourcing of public services is controversial to many, including mechanisms to ensure this type of transparency may be to everyone’s advantage. As the NAO warns, political pressure merely to reduce costs could cause providers to exit certain public sector markets, stifle innovation, reduce competition and possibly lead to higher prices.
The points raised by the NAO underline the importance of embedding transparency and a partnership ethos in outsourced contracts.
Part 7 of the Immigration Act 2016 will soon bring into force a “Code of Practice on the English language requirement for public sector workers”.
A recent judgment by Mr Justice Newey in Richards v Worcestershire County Council and another could have huge implications for local authorities and CCGs providing after-care services to patients.
The definition of ‘worker’ under the Whistleblowing legislation is already much wider than in other areas.
An adult social care provider was yesterday sentenced to a £190,000 fine at Bradford Magistrates' Court for failing to provide safe care and treatment.
Keep up with the latest content from Browne Jacobson:
© Copyright Browne Jacobson LLP 2016 - All rights reserved