Please sign in with your existing account details.
Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.
Privacy statement - Terms and conditions
Forgotten your password?
You have exceeded the maximum number of login attempts for this email address and your account has been locked. An email has been sent to member of Browne Jacobson's web team and some one will be contacting you over the next two working days with details of how to change your password.
displaying 1-10 of 699
Reset
As part of a collaborative group led by NHS England, The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence published its draft guidance on the procurement of Digital Health Technologies on 10th December 2018.
View legal update
The NHS Long Term Plan has now been published following several days of snippets being fed to the media on the benefits which the Plan will seek to introduce.
NICE publishes draft guidance on the procurement of Digital Health Technologies (DHT).
View blog
This case considered whether the High Court’s inherent jurisdiction can be used to authorise a deprivation of liberty of a patient with capacity who is subject to a conditional discharge under the Mental Health Act 1983.
This Supreme Court case considered the interplay between Community Treatment Orders under the Mental Health Act 1983 and deprivation of liberty.
With the Supreme Court announcing their decision on the case of MM, Rebecca highlights how neither the mental health Tribunal nor the Secretary of State for Justice have the power to give a patient a conditional discharge under the Mental Health Act where those conditions amount to a deprivation of liberty.
View video
In this webinar, Carl discusses four main topics, minimum wage for sleep-in shifts, recent learning disability and autism CQC registration appeals, the latest on CQC enforcement and CMA advice on care home fees, terms and conditions.
On 28 November 2018 the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in relation to MM (Secretary of State for Justice (Respondent) v MM (Appellant) [2018] UKSC 60).
In this video, Kelly Buckley and Lucy Erskine provide an insight into the current legal position and offer practical tips to ensure that clinicians are having the genuine dialogue needed with patients about relevant treatment options and risks to enable valid consent to be obtained.
In the Mencap case the Court of Appeal held that care workers undertaking sleep-in shifts are only entitled to the NMW when they are required to actually be awake
Filter by content type
Filter by sector
Filter by service