0370 270 6000

Abdulla decision revives old equal pay claims

17 November 2011
In the past few years, schools across the country have had to deal with equal pay claims arising out of single status. Whether it is defending these claims, negotiating settlement, or having a reduction in delegated budget due to councils’ decisions to settle group claims, few schools have been untouched. Until now, employees have always pursued equal pay claims in employment tribunals. The time limit for presenting an equal pay claim to an employment tribunal is, in the majority of cases, six months from the end of employment. The recent case of Abdulla v Birmingham City Council, has implications which may mean that a whole raft of claims which previously were though to be out of time, may now be able to be pursued. 

The Abdulla case 

In this case 174 former employees consider that they have claims in respect of bonuses paid to predominantly male groups in jobs the employees say were rated as equivalent by the employer in accordance with a job evaluation scheme in the Blue Book (collectively agreed terms and conditions for manual workers in local authorities). They were all too late to bring a claim in the employment tribunals, so issued breach of contract claims in the High Court where the time limit for bringing a claim is six years from the date of the breach. The council applied to strike out the claims, inviting the court to exercise its discretion under s. 2(3) Equal Pay Act 1970, which provides that where it appears to the court that the claim “… could more conveniently be disposed of separately by an employment tribunal, the court may direct that the claim… be struck out…” 

The decision 

Dismissing the Council’s application, Colin Edelman QC held that the employees could bring their claims in the High Court. He considered that 'disposed of' meant determining the merits of a particular case and so it could not be 'more convenient' for a claim to be disposed of by an employment tribunal, in circumstances where the tribunal would simply strike it out for being out of time. The decision here is in direct contrast to a similar case involving the same employer in which another judge held that the claim should be struck out for this reason. 

Potential implications for employers 

Subject to the outcome of any appeal, it will now be possible for employees to bring equal pay claims in the High Court within six years of their final pay date. It may also mean that an employee who had previously brought an equal pay claim in the employment tribunal, but had it struck out as being out of time, can now bring their claim in the High Court. In terms of the amount of any claim, back-pay can only be claimed for six years from the date the claim is issued at court, so the amount of compensation ought, theoretically, to be the same as if the claim were brought in the employment tribunals. If High Court equal pay claims are lost or settled by the employer, they will certainly be more expensive than if they had been brought in the employment tribunals. This is because, in High Court litigation, the losing side generally has to pay the winner’s legal fees. If the employee’s solicitors are acting on a ‘no-win-no-fee’ basis, then the losing side’s liability can also include a ‘success fee’ of up to 100% of normal charges, and the premiums for 'after the event' legal expenses insurance. However, the prospect of having to pay the employer’s legal costs may act as a barrier to employees bringing claims with little prospect of success. As a practical point, if you receive a High Court or County Court claim form, you should seek legal advice without delay as action is normally required within 14 days to protect your position.

Focus on...

Complex allegations and safeguarding terminations: How to limit cost, risk and delay

Be empowered to take a realistic approach to risk by understanding the likely outcomes of a dismissal. And, learn how timely, strategic decision-making can limit costs associated with removing unsuitable employees.


Legal updates

Advocacy in Action: online learning during a national pandemic

Over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, schools have had to alter the way they provide education to their pupils. This has involved schools having to be creative and flexible in how they deliver the curriculum to a diverse cohort of pupils.


Published articles

Moving on from COVID: Legal considerations in a Post-Pandemic World

There are several considerations for senior leaders and governors/trustees of schools to keep in mind as we go forward.


Published articles

Flexible working in a post Covid world

The Coronavirus Pandemic made many changes in Education. Some changes will remain after the pandemic including the way we go about our work.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up