logo-education
0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Abdulla decision revives old equal pay claims

17 November 2011
In the past few years, schools across the country have had to deal with equal pay claims arising out of single status. Whether it is defending these claims, negotiating settlement, or having a reduction in delegated budget due to councils’ decisions to settle group claims, few schools have been untouched. Until now, employees have always pursued equal pay claims in employment tribunals. The time limit for presenting an equal pay claim to an employment tribunal is, in the majority of cases, six months from the end of employment. The recent case of Abdulla v Birmingham City Council, has implications which may mean that a whole raft of claims which previously were though to be out of time, may now be able to be pursued. 
 

The Abdulla case 

In this case 174 former employees consider that they have claims in respect of bonuses paid to predominantly male groups in jobs the employees say were rated as equivalent by the employer in accordance with a job evaluation scheme in the Blue Book (collectively agreed terms and conditions for manual workers in local authorities). They were all too late to bring a claim in the employment tribunals, so issued breach of contract claims in the High Court where the time limit for bringing a claim is six years from the date of the breach. The council applied to strike out the claims, inviting the court to exercise its discretion under s. 2(3) Equal Pay Act 1970, which provides that where it appears to the court that the claim “… could more conveniently be disposed of separately by an employment tribunal, the court may direct that the claim… be struck out…” 

The decision 

Dismissing the Council’s application, Colin Edelman QC held that the employees could bring their claims in the High Court. He considered that 'disposed of' meant determining the merits of a particular case and so it could not be 'more convenient' for a claim to be disposed of by an employment tribunal, in circumstances where the tribunal would simply strike it out for being out of time. The decision here is in direct contrast to a similar case involving the same employer in which another judge held that the claim should be struck out for this reason. 

Potential implications for employers 

Subject to the outcome of any appeal, it will now be possible for employees to bring equal pay claims in the High Court within six years of their final pay date. It may also mean that an employee who had previously brought an equal pay claim in the employment tribunal, but had it struck out as being out of time, can now bring their claim in the High Court. In terms of the amount of any claim, back-pay can only be claimed for six years from the date the claim is issued at court, so the amount of compensation ought, theoretically, to be the same as if the claim were brought in the employment tribunals. If High Court equal pay claims are lost or settled by the employer, they will certainly be more expensive than if they had been brought in the employment tribunals. This is because, in High Court litigation, the losing side generally has to pay the winner’s legal fees. If the employee’s solicitors are acting on a ‘no-win-no-fee’ basis, then the losing side’s liability can also include a ‘success fee’ of up to 100% of normal charges, and the premiums for 'after the event' legal expenses insurance. However, the prospect of having to pay the employer’s legal costs may act as a barrier to employees bringing claims with little prospect of success. As a practical point, if you receive a High Court or County Court claim form, you should seek legal advice without delay as action is normally required within 14 days to protect your position.

training and events

14Oct

ISBL regional Conference Sheffield

Browne Jacobson’s Associate Sophie Jackson discusses the rise in growth of SEN and the impact of this on schools. Please note that this event was postponed from June 2020.

View event

19Nov

CST Inaugural Annual Conference Hilton Metropole, NEC, National Exhibition Centre, Pendigo Way, Marston Green, Birmingham, B40 1PP

Come and meet the team at CST’s Inaugural Annual Conference this summer. Partner Nick MacKenzie will also be delivering a workshop on governance leadership.

View event

focus on...

Legal updates

Trade union relations

FAQs on Trade Union Safety Representatives.

View

Legal updates

The mental health of higher education staff – duty of care in uncertain times

As we embrace mental health awareness week from 18 May 2020, it is timely to reflect on some of the steps that HEIs can take to discharge their duty of care in uncertain times.

View

Legal updates

Recruitment in schools and academies during COVID-19

The current emergency means that we need to do things differently and this includes how we recruit new staff to our schools and academies.

View

Legal updates

The Government’s Job Retention Scheme - New guidance for higher education (HE) providers

The Department for Education has recently published guidance on the Government’s Job Retention Scheme which has now been extended to last until the end of June this year. It has clarified that its primary focus is to ensure that Higher Education providers are able to continue delivering HE services and support the needs of students both on and off the campus.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up