logo-education
0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Regulations on coasting schools published

31 October 2016

Regulations which define coasting schools have now been laid before Parliament. They are the final legal piece of the school intervention jigsaw brought about by this Government’s Education and Adoption Act.

The definition is based on published performance data (with separate definitions for primary and secondary) over a three year period. It now includes the progress score thresholds for 2016 performance. Their inclusion was designed to quieten previous concerns that schools with low-attaining intakes would be placed at a disadvantage. However, a recent Education Policy Institute report identified that, even taking the Progress 8 score into account, secondary schools with high rates of disadvantage are still far more likely to be labelled as coasting.

The DfE state that the coasting criteria reflect “accountability measures that schools already know and understand”. It will be interesting to see whether there is in fact scope for debate based on the data and even more interesting to see any patterns in how RSCs exercise their intervention 'discretion' when 'supporting' coasting schools.

The draft regulations will now go through the Parliamentary process but, in any event, the DfE has stated that coasting schools will not be identified until after the 2016 performance tables have been published.

Related opinions

Schools face scrutiny over Covid-19 vaccinations for children

On 4 June, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) approved the use of the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine for 12- to 15-year-olds.

View blog

School not liable for reckless actions of a student

The decision reinforces that the standard of the duty of care owed by schools is one or reasonableness.

View blog

Avoiding grade challenges on ‘unconscious bias’

A system based on teacher assessed grades, rather than external exams, was inevitably going to give rise to speculation about bias and objectivity in teacher assessment and grading decisions. Schools can prepare now for these kinds of challenges by ensuring that they have clear written evidence readily available.

View blog

Teachers report inadequate training on peer-on-peer abuse

Despite the increased media and regulatory focus on peer-on-peer abuse within schools, teachers are still reporting that they feel undertrained and ill-equipped to recognise and respond to allegations and incidents.

View blog

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up