0370 270 6000

Search

Search Mobile

collapse

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

Email address

Password

Sign in with LinkedIn

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Register with LinkedIn

Forgotten your password?

collapseSign

Browne Jacobson home

Home

Insights

Blogs

Should redundancy be a tick box exercise?

Should redundancy be a tick box exercise?

14 August 2012

When making redundancies from a pool of staff, the safest approach is always to use objective criteria that can be measured, reducing the risk of challenge. Or is it? The employment appeal tribunal (EAT) has cautioned against this approach in a recent decision.

The employment tribunal criticised the employer for using subjective selection criteria, one of which was: ‘which of 5 management roles could be lost with the least effect on the organisation.’ On appeal, the EAT said there was nothing wrong with using subjective criteria. It went on to caution against only using criteria which can be 'scored or assessed' as that could reduce selection procedures to box ticking exercises. Just because subjective criteria are matters of judgement, it does not mean that they cannot be assessed in a dispassionate or objective way. Hopefully this decision will give employers more confidence in using a selection process which is both fair and best suited to the needs of the organisation.

Related opinions

Schools face scrutiny over Covid-19 vaccinations for children

On 4 June, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) approved the use of the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine for 12- to 15-year-olds.

School not liable for reckless actions of a student

The decision reinforces that the standard of the duty of care owed by schools is one or reasonableness.

Avoiding grade challenges on ‘unconscious bias’

A system based on teacher assessed grades, rather than external exams, was inevitably going to give rise to speculation about bias and objectivity in teacher assessment and grading decisions. Schools can prepare now for these kinds of challenges by ensuring that they have clear written evidence readily available.

Teachers report inadequate training on peer-on-peer abuse

Despite the increased media and regulatory focus on peer-on-peer abuse within schools, teachers are still reporting that they feel undertrained and ill-equipped to recognise and respond to allegations and incidents.

View all blogs

Heather Mitchell

Partner

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up