Download your free guide now
Download your free guide now

Brian Smith, Managing Partner

Brian Smith, Managing Partner

t: 0115 976 6268

f: 0115 947 5246

bsmith@brownejacobson.com

 

|

Claimant's Application for Unreasonable Conduct Costs

The Claimant pursued a claim for special damages in the sum of £662.05 against the Defendant following a road traffic accident on the 24th May 2001. Liability was in dispute. On the 10th January 2003, the Claimant's solicitors made a without prejudice offer to the Defendant's insurers to settle the claim. This was ignored. The Claimant issued proceedings on the 14th April 2003, which were served on the Defendant and went unanswered. The Claimant's solicitors requested interlocutory judgement for damages to be assessed which was entered on the 2nd May 2003. By letter dated 6th May 2003, the Claimant's solicitors sent a copy of the Interlocutory Judgement to the Defendant's insurers. The Defendant's insurers settled the claim.

 

On the 28th May 2003 the Claimant's solicitors requested payment of their costs. The Defendant's insurers refused. The Claimant's solicitors issued an application against the Defendant pursuant to CPR 27.14(2)(d) for unreasonable conduct costs on the basis that the Defendant settled the Claimant's claim following issue of proceedings when there was no material change in circumstances. The Defendant opposed the Application on the basis that the District Judge could only award unreasonable conduct costs where the claim had been allocated to track. The claim had never been allocated and the Court could not treat the hearing as a disposal hearing on the grounds that the case had already been compromised. The hearing was an Application hearing for costs, not a disposal hearing and could not be allocated at that stage.

 

HELD: - The District Judge agreed that he could not allocate the claim at that stage. The claim had already been compromised and he could only deal with the Claimant's Application if he allocated the claim to the Small Claims Track. Application dismissed with Defendant's costs of the Application summarily assessed and ordered to be paid by the Claimant.