bulletin


The right to die


23 February 2009


A recent ruling in the Court of Appeal has failed to clarify the law on assisted suicide.

Debbie Purdy, aged 45, suffers from progressive multiple sclerosis. Her wish is to travel to a clinic abroad where assisted suicide is not illegal. Ms Purdy wants her husband to accompany her, but sought clarification from the Director of Public Prosecutions that he would not be charged with a criminal offence on his return to the UK.

Whilst the act of suicide itself is not a crime, the 1961 Suicide Act makes it an offence to aid or abet a suicide or a suicide attempt, punishable by up to 14 years in prison. This offence takes into account the potential scope for malpractice. A decision to bring a prosecution under the Suicide Act rests with the Director for Public Prosecutions. Ms Purdy argued that it was not clear how these decisions were reached and what criteria were applied in deciding when a prosecution might be brought.

Ms Purdy’s request for specific guidance in relation to assisted suicide was rejected. The Court of Appeal ruled that only Parliament could decide if the law should change, and if guidelines were issued, this may recognise exceptional defences to the offence. Consideration was, however, given to the case of Daniel James, a 23 year old who was taken by his family to a Swiss clinic to end his life after a paralysing rugby accident. The matter was investigated by the police but the Director of Public Prosecutions decided it was not in the public interest to bring a prosecution against his family. Indeed, to date the Director of Public Prosecutions has never found a basis for prosecution in any case of assisted dying.

This case may have implications for those dealing with patients suffering from terminal or highly debilitating illnesses. It is also interesting to compare this case with the so called ‘Principle of Double Effect’, whereby a clinical action can have a primary positive effect, for example a palliative dose of pain relieving drugs, but a secondary effect of hastening death.

talk to us


picture of Sian Brown
Sian Brown
0115 976 6571
Solicitor
picture of Simon Tait
Simon Tait
0115 976 6559/0121 237 3913
Partner and Head of Health
 

save to PDF

 


The content of this bulletin is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

related services & sectors
health 
sign up
sign up
keep up-to-date with free legal bulletins, updates & training
more
return to resources
return to resources
click here to return to our resources section
more